From: Rene Rebe <rene@exactcode.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, hdegoede@redhat.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unbreak all modern Seagate ATA pass-through for SMART
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:41:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210425.124119.1949311822603950729.rene@exactcode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIUbHKqs2gQPAu2T@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 09:20:59AM +0200, René Rebe wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > > On 25. Apr 2021, at 04:31, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > >> Seagate devices" in 2017. Apparently some early ones where buggy, ...
> > >>
> > >> However, fast forward a couple of years and this is no longer true,
> > >> this Segate Seven even is already from 2016, and apparently first
> > >> available in 2015. I suggest removing this rather drastic global
> > >> measure, and instead only add very old broken ones with individual
> > >> quirks, should any of them still be alive ;-)
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: René Rebe <rene@exactcode.com>
> > >>
> > >> --- linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h.backup 2021-03-05 11:36:00.517423726 +0100
> > >> +++ linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h 2021-03-05 11:36:16.373424544 +0100
> > >> @@ -113,8 +113,4 @@
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> - /* All Seagate disk enclosures have broken ATA pass-through support */
> > >> - if (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2)
> > >> - flags |= US_FL_NO_ATA_1X;
> > >> -
> > >> usb_stor_adjust_quirks(udev, &flags);
> > >
> > > I don't want to do this unless you can suggest an approach that won't
> > > suddenly break all those old buggy drives. Just because they are now
> > > five years old or more doesn't mean they are no longer in use.
> >
> > Well, what do you propose then? A allow quirk for all new devices going forward?
> > Given that the user usually needs to actively run something like smartctl
> > manually on the drive I don’t see that this should cause too many issues.
> > I don’t have any non-supporting device - can we not just add them to the
> > quirk list when someone reports one?
>
> How about since you know your device works, you make the check detect
> your specific device and not apply the flag to it? You should be able
> to do so based on the
Sure, while that does not really solve this for all the other newer
Seagate drives other users might have at home, here is a patch
checking for this one USB product ID. I hope that is what you meant:
Signed-off-by: René Rebe <rene@exactcode.com>
--- linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h.backup 2021-03-05 11:36:00.517423726 +0100
+++ linux-5.11/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h 2021-03-05 11:36:16.373424544 +0100
@@ -113,5 +113,6 @@
/* All Seagate disk enclosures have broken ATA pass-through support */
- if (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2)
+ if ((le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0bc2) &&
+ (le16_to_cpu(udev->descriptor.idProduct) != 0xab03))
flags |= US_FL_NO_ATA_1X;
--
René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
https://exactcode.com | https://t2sde.org | https://rene.rebe.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-25 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-24 20:03 [PATCH] unbreak all modern Seagate ATA pass-through for SMART Rene Rebe
2021-04-25 2:31 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-25 7:20 ` René Rebe
2021-04-25 7:32 ` Greg KH
2021-04-25 10:41 ` Rene Rebe [this message]
2021-04-25 10:47 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-25 10:58 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-25 11:50 ` Rene Rebe
2021-04-25 12:00 ` Greg KH
2021-04-25 12:15 ` Rene Rebe
2021-04-25 12:27 ` Greg KH
2021-04-25 15:50 ` Rene Rebe
2021-04-25 18:14 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-25 14:45 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-25 15:02 ` Rene Rebe
2021-04-25 18:25 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-25 20:52 ` René Rebe
2021-04-26 8:16 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-26 8:52 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-26 9:40 ` Rene Rebe
2021-04-26 9:54 ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-25 10:43 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210425.124119.1949311822603950729.rene@exactcode.com \
--to=rene@exactcode.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox