From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
letux-kernel@openphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: Check devctl status again for a spurious session request
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:59:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210604115949.4c74d4af@aktux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLn06uuntThMlaTQ@atomide.com>
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:39:54 +0300
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> [210604 08:35]:
> > I inserted some more dev-dbg
> > [ 60.241790] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> > [ 60.245513] Filesystems sync: 0.000 seconds
> > [ 60.251312] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [ 60.260040] OOM killer disabled.
> > [ 60.263275] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [ 60.272338] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > [ 60.281311] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 runtime_resume
> > -> this is triggered by what?
>
> I think that comes from the pm_runtime_get_sync() in musb_suspend().
>
@@ -2825,6 +2826,7 @@ static int musb_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct musb *musb = dev_to_musb(dev);
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
+ dev_dbg(musb->controller, "musb_suspend begin\n");
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
if (ret < 0) {
my dev_dbg comes before that.
> > [ 60.281341] twl4030_usb 48070000.i2c:twl@48:twl4030-usb: twl4030_usb_runtime_resume
> > -> and here something stays on...
> >
> > [ 60.346374] twl4030_usb 48070000.i2c:twl@48:twl4030-usb: twl4030_phy_power_on
> > [ 60.796630] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_suspend begin
> > [ 60.796722] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_suspend end
> > [ 60.796752] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 suspend
> > [ 60.796783] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 runtime_suspend
> > [ 60.796783] twl4030_usb 48070000.i2c:twl@48:twl4030-usb: twl4030_phy_power_off
> > [ 60.796813] twl4030_usb 48070000.i2c:twl@48:twl4030-usb: twl4030_usb_suspend
> > [ 60.806549] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> > [ 60.806579] Successfully put all powerdomains to target state
>
> Well since commit 88d26136a256 ("PM: Prevent runtime suspend during system resume")
> nothing gets runtime idled during suspend with the extra pm_runtime_get_noresume()
> call in device_prepare() that does not get released until in device_complete().
>
well, the result is that the phy stays powered on. And that is the
problem.
static int twl4030_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
and
static int __maybe_unused twl4030_usb_suspend(struct device *dev)
do not turn off the phy. I think the solution is to turn the phy off if
no cable is connected.
> > forcing omap2430 runtime on before suspend:
> > [ 160.467742] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 runtime_resume
> > [ 165.001495] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> > [ 165.005218] Filesystems sync: 0.000 seconds
> > [ 165.010284] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [ 165.018981] OOM killer disabled.
> > [ 165.022247] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [ 165.031311] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > [ 165.040496] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_suspend begin
> > [ 165.040618] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_suspend end
> > [ 165.040618] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 suspend
> > [ 165.040649] musb-omap2430 480ab000.usb_otg_hs: omap2430 runtime_suspend
> > [ 165.040679] twl4030_usb 48070000.i2c:twl@48:twl4030-usb: twl4030_usb_suspend
> > [ 165.050506] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> > [ 165.050537] Successfully put all powerdomains to target state
>
> That's interesting. Hmm so we bail out early based on glue->is_runtime_suspended,
> and omap3 is still probing devices with omap_device.c instead of ti-sysc.c, so
> sounds like the duplicate calls you noticed might cause the issue.
>
> Does the following patch fix things for you or does something else break again? :)
>
looks like something I have already tried, but I will give it a look
again.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 15:06 [PATCH] usb: musb: Check devctl status again for a spurious session request Tony Lindgren
2021-05-27 19:15 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-05-28 5:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-05-28 9:37 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-02 5:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-03 21:22 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-04 8:35 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-04 9:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-04 9:59 ` Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2021-06-04 10:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-04 10:20 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-04 14:45 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-04 16:59 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-05 5:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-05 14:20 ` Andreas Kemnade
2021-06-06 6:01 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210604115949.4c74d4af@aktux \
--to=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox