From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: braewoods@braewoods.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: Add compatibility quirk flags for iODD 2531/2541
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:38:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015133857.GA968676@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWkzxWyIhW08ZCcX@kroah.com>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 09:54:45AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 01:29:20AM -0500, braewoods@braewoods.net wrote:
> > On 2021-10-13 21:20, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > In the future, you should always include a version number in the email
> > > Subject: line (for example, "[PATCH v2]") so that readers will know
> > > which patch is which. And you should include, here just below the "---"
> > > line, a description of how this version differs from the previous
> > > version. See the email archives for examples of multi-version patches.
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, this looks okay.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> >
> > Noted. I'll do that for future patches. On a side note, any idea how long it
> > normally takes to get a simple patch like this committed? I've had mixed
> > experiences with getting feedback on patches. Sometimes my patches just get
> > totally ignored.
>
> Depends on the subsystem and the patch submitted.
Greg tends to be quite good at merging patches in a timely manner. They
generally are committed within a few weeks.
In this case, should the patch also be added to the -stable kernels?
Alan Stern
> Also always use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to properly copy the needed
> maintainers and mailing lists. Sometimes patches get lost in the noise
> if the right people are not copied.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 1:55 [PATCH] usb-storage: Add compatibility quirk flags for iODD 2531/2541 James Buren
2021-10-14 2:20 ` Alan Stern
2021-10-15 6:29 ` braewoods
2021-10-15 7:54 ` Greg KH
2021-10-15 13:38 ` Alan Stern [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-14 1:50 James Buren
2021-10-14 2:01 ` braewoods
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211015133857.GA968676@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=braewoods@braewoods.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox