From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Elson Serrao <quic_eserrao@quicinc.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
"quic_jackp@quicinc.com" <quic_jackp@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] usb: dwc3: Add remote wakeup handling
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 02:27:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230210022719.ktggsykndv4k7i42@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28322f07-de6b-81e0-38c5-c856d5ce2dce@quicinc.com>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023, Elson Serrao wrote:
>
>
> On 2/7/2023 6:11 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023, Elson Serrao wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/7/2023 5:10 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023, Elson Serrao wrote:
> > > > > On 2/6/2023 4:48 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > > > > +static int __dwc3_gadget_wakeup(struct dwc3 *dwc, bool async)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > int retries;
> > > > > > > @@ -2296,9 +2309,14 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_wakeup(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > > > > > > link_state = DWC3_DSTS_USBLNKST(reg);
> > > > > > > switch (link_state) {
> > > > > > > + case DWC3_LINK_STATE_U3: /* in HS, means SUSPEND */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's also possible to do remote wakeup in L1 for highspeed.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The rw_configured flag here is in context of triggering remote wakeup from
> > > > > bus suspend only.
> > > > >
> > > > > The remote wakeup setting for l1 in HighSpeed is controlled through LPM
> > > > > token and overrides/ignores the config desc bmAttributes wakeup bit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Section 4.1 of USB2_LinkPowerMangement_ECN[final] spec "The host system sets the Remote Wake Flag parameter in this request to
> > > > > enable or disable the addressed device
> > > > > for remote wake from L1. The value of this flag will temporarily (while in
> > > > > L1) override the current setting of the
> > > > > Remote Wake feature settable by the standard Set/ClearFeature() commands
> > > > > defined in Universal Serial Bus Specification, revision 2.0, Chapter 9."
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if I am missing something.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It overrides the setting of the SetFeature request, not the device
> > > > configuration.
> > > >
> > > > The rw_configured reflects the user configuration. Whether the host
> > > > tries to enable the remote wakeup through SetFeature request or LPM
> > > > token, the device should operate within the user configuration
> > > > limitation.
> > > >
> > > > If the configuration indicates that it doesn't support remote wakeup, we
> > > > should prevent unexpected behavior from the device. For simplicity, we
> > > > can just return failure to wakeup for all states.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Thinh
> > >
> > > L1 entry/exit is HW controlled and the remote wakeup is conditional.(Section
> > > 7.1/Table7.2 of dwc3 data book). Even though we block it from
> > > SW the l1 exit will still happen from HW point of view.
> > >
> > > To correlate the user configuration with LPM token, I experimented by
> > > disabling the wakeup bit in the bmAtrributes, but I still see remote wakeup
> > > bit being set in the LPM token. From the observation it seems like there is
> >
> > That's because the linux xhci driver enables remote wakeup bit in its
> > port without regard for the device configuration.
> >
> > > no correlation between the wakeup bit in the bmAtrributes and the wakeup bit
> > > in the LPM token.
> > >
> >
> > The host can bring the device out of L1, that's probably what you saw.
> > The controller doesn't initiate remote wakeup by itself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thinh
>
> Actually it seems the controller is initiating a remote wakeup by itself to
> exit from l1 when we send a STARTTRANSFER command. I did below experiment
> when the device was in HighSpeed
>
That's driven by the driver telling the controller to initiate remote
wakeup and not the controller itself. When we send the START_TRANSFER
command, the driver does remote wakeup so the host would bring the
device to ON state so that the command can go through.
However you bring up a good point that if we prevent remote wakeup for
L1, then we have to delay sending START_TRANSFER command until the host
initiate resume. This would require additional enhancement to dwc3 to
handle this scenario. For now, can we ignore this specific case when
sending START_TRANSFER command and only check for the case when the user
trigger remote wakeup via gadget->ops->wakeup/func_wakeup.
Thanks,
Thinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 19:13 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add function suspend/resume and remote wakeup support Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-06 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] usb: gadget: Properly configure the device for remote wakeup Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-06 20:14 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-06 20:30 ` Elson Serrao
2023-02-07 0:24 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-06 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] usb: dwc3: Add remote wakeup handling Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-07 0:48 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-07 22:41 ` Elson Serrao
2023-02-08 1:10 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-08 1:51 ` Elson Serrao
2023-02-08 2:11 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-10 1:36 ` Elson Serrao
2023-02-10 2:27 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-02-10 3:43 ` Elson Serrao
2023-02-07 10:45 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-06 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] usb: gadget: Add function wakeup support Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-07 1:14 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-07 5:56 ` Greg KH
2023-02-06 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] usb: dwc3: Add function suspend and " Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-06 19:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote " Elson Roy Serrao
2023-02-07 1:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Add function " Thinh Nguyen
2023-02-07 2:14 ` Elson Serrao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230210022719.ktggsykndv4k7i42@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_eserrao@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_jackp@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox