Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Elson Serrao <quic_eserrao@quicinc.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	"quic_jackp@quicinc.com" <quic_jackp@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/6] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote wakeup support
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:20:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317231956.w3kr3zcy44odxdko@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317212831.bcapq26jnuk2vkws@synopsys.com>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023, Elson Serrao wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 3/16/2023 5:11 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, Elson Roy Serrao wrote:
> > > > When host sends a suspend notification to the device, handle
> > > > the suspend callbacks in the function driver. Enhanced super
> > > > speed devices can support function suspend feature to put the
> > > > function in suspend state. Handle function suspend callback.
> > > > 
> > > > Depending on the remote wakeup capability the device can either
> > > > trigger a remote wakeup or wait for the host initiated resume to
> > > > start data transfer again.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@quicinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c   | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.h |  4 ++
> > > >   3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > index a7ab30e..c43cd557 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > @@ -633,6 +633,8 @@ static void ecm_disable(struct usb_function *f)
> > > >   	usb_ep_disable(ecm->notify);
> > > >   	ecm->notify->desc = NULL;
> > > > +	f->func_suspended = false;
> > > > +	f->func_wakeup_armed = false;
> > > >   }
> > > >   /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > > > @@ -885,6 +887,71 @@ static struct usb_function_instance *ecm_alloc_inst(void)
> > > >   	return &opts->func_inst;
> > > >   }
> > > > +static void ecm_suspend(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
> > > > +	struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (f->func_suspended) {
> > > > +		DBG(cdev, "Function already suspended\n");
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	DBG(cdev, "ECM Suspend\n");
> > > > +
> > > > +	gether_suspend(&ecm->port);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void ecm_resume(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
> > > > +	struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * If the function is in USB3 Function Suspend state, resume is
> > > > +	 * canceled. In this case resume is done by a Function Resume request.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (f->func_suspended)
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +
> > > > +	DBG(cdev, "ECM Resume\n");
> > > > +
> > > > +	gether_resume(&ecm->port);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ecm_get_status(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct usb_configuration *c = f->config;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* D0 and D1 bit set to 0 if device is not wakeup capable */
> > > > +	if (!(USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP & c->bmAttributes))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return (f->func_wakeup_armed ? USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW : 0) |
> > > > +		USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP;
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Why do we need to implement ecm_get_status if it's already handled in
> > > composite.c now?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes this can be removed now. Will modify accordingly.
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ecm_func_suspend(struct usb_function *f, u8 options)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = f->config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > +	DBG(cdev, "func susp %u cmd\n", options);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (options & (USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_LP >> 8)) {
> > > 
> > > This feature selector doesn't indicate whether it's SetFeature or
> > > ClearFeature request. ecm_func_suspend is supposed to be for
> > > SetFeature(suspend) only. Perhaps we may have to define func_resume()
> > > for ClearFeature(suspend)?
> > > 
> 
> > Host uses the same feature selector FUNCTION_SUSPEND for function suspend
> > and function resume and func_suspend() callback can be used to
> > handle both the cases ? The distinction comes whether it is a
> 
> How do you plan to handle that? Pass this info in some unused/reserved
> bit of the "options" argument? Introduce a new parameter to the
> func_suspend()?
> 
> If that's the case, then you need to update the document on
> func_suspend() to also support ClearFeature(suspend). Right now it's
> documented for SetFeature only. Also, make sure that other existing
> function drivers will not break because of the change of the
> func_suspend behavior.
> 
> > SetFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) or ClearFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) which can be
> > easily done in the func_suspend callback itself. We can add another callback
> > func_resume specific to ClearFeature(FUNCTION_SUSPEND) but wont that be
> > redundant and more callback handling on function driver/composite side as
> > well? Please let me know your opinion.
> > 
> 
> We actually didn't properly define func_suspend and its counter part. It
> seems cleaner to me to introduce func_resume as it seems more intuitive
> and easier to read. Let me know how you plan to use func_suspend() for
> both cases.
> 

How about we handle function suspend resume in composite also? I mean
something like this:

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
index 36add1879ed2..79dc055eb5f7 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
@@ -1948,9 +1948,18 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
 		f = cdev->config->interface[intf];
 		if (!f)
 			break;
-		status = f->get_status ? f->get_status(f) : 0;
-		if (status < 0)
-			break;
+
+		if (f->get_status) {
+			status = f->get_status(f);
+			if (status < 0)
+				break;
+		} else {
+			if (f->config->bmAttributes & USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP) {
+				status |= USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP;
+				if (f->func_wakeup_armed)
+					status |= USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW;
+			}
+		}
 		put_unaligned_le16(status & 0x0000ffff, req->buf);
 		break;
 	/*
@@ -1971,9 +1980,28 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
 			f = cdev->config->interface[intf];
 			if (!f)
 				break;
+			if (w_index & USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_RW) {
+				if (!(f->config->bmAttributes & USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP))
+					break;
+
+				f->func_wakeup_armed = (ctrl->bRequest == USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE);
+			}
+
 			value = 0;
-			if (f->func_suspend)
+			if (f->func_suspend) {
 				value = f->func_suspend(f, w_index >> 8);
+			} else if (w_index & USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_LP) {
+				if (f->suspend && && !f->func_suspended &&
+				    ctrl->bRequest == USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE)) {
+					f->suspend(f);
+					f->func_suspended = true;
+				} else if (f->resume && f->func_suspended &&
+					   ctrl->bRequest == USB_REQ_CLEAR_FEATURE_FEATURE)) {
+					f->resume(f);
+					f->func_suspended = false;
+				}
+			}
+
 			if (value < 0) {
 				ERROR(cdev,
 				      "func_suspend() returned error %d\n",


Also, do we need the f->func_suspended flag? we'd need the remote wakeup
flag for the status, but when do we need f->func_suspended? It seems
like it can be handled within the function driver's scope.

Thanks,
Thinh

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 23:38 [PATCH v12 0/6] Add function suspend/resume and remote wakeup support Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] usb: gadget: Properly configure the device for remote wakeup Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] usb: dwc3: Add remote wakeup handling Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] usb: gadget: Add function wakeup support Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] usb: dwc3: Add function suspend and " Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] usb: gadget: arm the function for triggering remote wakeup Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-16 23:38 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote wakeup support Elson Roy Serrao
2023-03-17  0:11   ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-03-17 17:59     ` Elson Serrao
2023-03-17 21:28       ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-03-17 23:20         ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-03-18  0:23           ` Elson Serrao
2023-03-18  2:26             ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-03-20 17:42               ` Elson Serrao
2023-03-24  0:12                 ` Elson Serrao
2023-03-24  0:59                   ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-03-24  1:14                     ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-03-21  8:12   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230317231956.w3kr3zcy44odxdko@synopsys.com \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_eserrao@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jackp@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox