From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Sanath S <Sanath.S@amd.com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@amd.com, andreas.noever@gmail.com,
michael.jamet@intel.com, YehezkelShB@gmail.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_reset_ports(), tb_port_reset() and usb4_port_reset()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:27:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231212152706.GG1074920@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212140047.2021496-2-Sanath.S@amd.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 07:30:46PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> Introduce the tb_switch_reset_ports() function that resets the
> downstream ports of a given switch. This helps us reset the USB4
> links created by boot firmware during the init sequence.
>
> Introduce the tb_port_reset() helper function that resets the
> given port.
>
> Introduce the usb4_port_reset() function that performs the DPR
> of a given port. This function follows the CM guide specification 7.3
>
> Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sanath S <Sanath.S@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h | 2 ++
> drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h | 1 +
> drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> index 44e9b09de47a..26ad6cc1ee91 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> @@ -626,6 +626,19 @@ int tb_port_unlock(struct tb_port *port)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * tb_port_reset() - Reset downstream port
> + * @port: Port to reset
> + *
> + * Helps to reconfigure the USB4 link by resetting the downstream port.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> + */
> +static int tb_port_reset(struct tb_port *port)
> +{
> + return usb4_port_reset(port);
> +}
> +
> static int __tb_port_enable(struct tb_port *port, bool enable)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -1547,6 +1560,24 @@ static void tb_dump_switch(const struct tb *tb, const struct tb_switch *sw)
> regs->__unknown1, regs->__unknown4);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * tb_switch_reset_ports() - Reset downstream ports of switch.
> + * @sw: Switch whose ports need to be reset.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> + */
> +int tb_switch_reset_ports(struct tb_switch *sw)
> +{
> + struct tb_port *port;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
Why it returns -EINVAL? What if this is run for non-USB4 router?
> +
> + tb_switch_for_each_port(sw, port) {
> + if (tb_port_is_null(port) && port->cap_usb4)
> + ret = tb_port_reset(port);
Should it stop here and return ret?
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * tb_switch_reset() - reconfigure route, enable and send TB_CFG_PKG_RESET
> * @sw: Switch to reset
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> index e299e53473ae..f2687ec4ac53 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> @@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ void tb_switch_remove(struct tb_switch *sw);
> void tb_switch_suspend(struct tb_switch *sw, bool runtime);
> int tb_switch_resume(struct tb_switch *sw);
> int tb_switch_reset(struct tb_switch *sw);
> +int tb_switch_reset_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
> int tb_switch_wait_for_bit(struct tb_switch *sw, u32 offset, u32 bit,
> u32 value, int timeout_msec);
> void tb_sw_set_unplugged(struct tb_switch *sw);
> @@ -1281,6 +1282,7 @@ struct tb_port *usb4_switch_map_usb3_down(struct tb_switch *sw,
> int usb4_switch_add_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
> void usb4_switch_remove_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
>
> +int usb4_port_reset(struct tb_port *port);
> int usb4_port_unlock(struct tb_port *port);
> int usb4_port_hotplug_enable(struct tb_port *port);
> int usb4_port_configure(struct tb_port *port);
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> index 87e4795275fe..d49530bc0d53 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ struct tb_regs_port_header {
> #define PORT_CS_18_CSA BIT(22)
> #define PORT_CS_18_TIP BIT(24)
> #define PORT_CS_19 0x13
> +#define PORT_CS_19_DPR BIT(0)
> #define PORT_CS_19_PC BIT(3)
> #define PORT_CS_19_PID BIT(4)
> #define PORT_CS_19_WOC BIT(16)
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> index 4277733d0021..55f7c163bf84 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,45 @@ void usb4_switch_remove_ports(struct tb_switch *sw)
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * usb4_port_reset() - Reset USB4 downsteam port
> + * @port: USB4 port to reset.
> + *
> + * Helps to reconfigure USB4 link by resetting downstream port.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> + */
> +int usb4_port_reset(struct tb_port *port)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 val = 0;
Reverse christmas tree please:
u32 val = 0;
int ret;
> +
> + ret = tb_port_read(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + val = val | PORT_CS_19_DPR;
> + ret = tb_port_write(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Wait for 10ms after requesting downstream port reset */
> + msleep(10);
Probably good to add a couple of more ms just in case. Also
usleep_range()? (or fsleep()).
> +
> + ret = tb_port_read(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + val &= ~PORT_CS_19_DPR;
> + ret = tb_port_write(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * usb4_port_unlock() - Unlock USB4 downstream port
> * @port: USB4 port to unlock
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 14:00 [PATCH 0/2] Add support for downstream port reset(DPR) Sanath S
2023-12-12 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_reset_ports(), tb_port_reset() and usb4_port_reset() Sanath S
2023-12-12 15:27 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2023-12-12 15:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-12-12 15:41 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-12 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset downstream ports created by boot firmware Sanath S
2023-12-12 15:10 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231212152706.GG1074920@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Sanath.S@amd.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox