public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Sanath S <sanaths2@amd.com>
Cc: Sanath S <Sanath.S@amd.com>,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, andreas.noever@gmail.com,
	michael.jamet@intel.com, YehezkelShB@gmail.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset downstream ports created by boot firmware
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:18:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231218131840.GH1074920@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <997f2a94-66d9-fb95-8f75-46d61937f7e8@amd.com>

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 06:35:13PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> 
> On 12/18/2023 5:53 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > > > The discover part should not do anything (like write the hardware) so
> > > > > perhaps it is just some timing thing (but that's weird too).
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think we should do something like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1. Disable all enabled protocol adapters (reset them to defaults).
> > > > > 2. Clear all protocol adapter paths.
> > > > > 3. Issue DPR over all enabled USB4 ports.
> > > > > 
> > > > > BTW, what you mean "didn't work"?
> > > > Path activation would go fine after DPR like below:
> > > > 
> > > > [   15.090905] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: 0:5 <-> 2:9 (PCI): activating
> > > > [   15.090932] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Down path from 0:5
> > > > to 2:9
> > > > [   15.091602] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Up path from 2:9 to
> > > > 0:5
> > > > 
> > > > But, PCIE enumeration doesn't happen (pcie link up will not happen, will not
> > > > see below logs)
> > > > [   15.134223] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
> > > > [   15.134243] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
> > > Okay, what if you like reset the PCIe adapter config spaces back to the
> > > defaults? Just as an experiment.
> > If this turns out to be really complex then I guess it is better to do
> > it like you did originally using discovery but at least it would be nice
> > to see what the end result of this experiment looks like :)
> 
> Yes, I'll give a try.
> As an experiment, I tried to compare the path deactivation that occurs at
> two place.
> 1. In tb_switch_reset where we are calling tb_path_deactivate_hop(port, i).
> 2. While we get a unplug event after doing DPR.
> 
> I observed both have different hop_index and port numbers.
> So, are we calling tb_path_deactivate_hop with wrong hop ids ?

Wrong adapters possibly.

> From deactivate tunnel (called while unplug) :
> [    3.408268] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: deactivating PCIe Down path from
> 2:9 to 0:5
> [    3.408282] deactivate hop port = 9 hop_index=8
> [    3.408328] deactivate hop port = 2 hop_index=10

Definitely should be port = 5 (that's PCIe down in your log) and
hop_index = 8 (that's the one used with PCIe).

> Deactivate from tb_switch_reset() :
> deactivate hop port = 5 hop_index=8

Can you add some more logging and provide me the dmesg or
alternativively investigate it yourself. You can use tb_port_dbg() to
get the port numbers to the log.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-18 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-12 19:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for downstream port reset(DPR) Sanath S
2023-12-12 19:16 ` [Patch v2 1/2] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_reset_ports(), tb_port_reset() and usb4_port_reset() Sanath S
2023-12-12 19:26   ` Mario Limonciello
2023-12-13  5:59   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-13 11:58     ` Sanath S
2023-12-13 12:04       ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-12 19:16 ` [Patch v2 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset downstream ports created by boot firmware Sanath S
2023-12-12 19:24   ` Mario Limonciello
2023-12-12 19:25     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-12-13  5:49   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-13  6:18     ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-13  6:23       ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-13 10:34         ` Sanath S
2023-12-13 11:52           ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-14  6:38             ` Sanath S
2023-12-14  7:07               ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-14  7:20                 ` Sanath S
2023-12-14  7:32                   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-14 15:30                     ` Sanath S
2023-12-15 11:55                       ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-15 13:54                         ` Sanath S
2023-12-15 14:02                           ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-18 10:20                             ` Sanath S
2023-12-18 10:42                               ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-18 11:19                                 ` Sanath S
2023-12-18 11:31                                   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-18 12:23                                     ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-18 13:05                                       ` Sanath S
2023-12-18 13:18                                         ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2023-12-19  9:11                                           ` Sanath S
2023-12-19 12:26                                             ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-19 14:35                                               ` Sanath S
2023-12-19 18:04                                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-20 12:58                                                   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-12-20 17:01                                                     ` Sanath S
2023-12-21  9:31                                                       ` Sanath S
2023-12-21  9:53                                                         ` Mika Westerberg
2024-01-03 14:15                                                           ` Sanath S
2024-01-03 17:17                                                             ` Mika Westerberg
2024-01-04 13:47                                                               ` Sanath S
2024-01-04 13:50                                                               ` Sanath S
2024-01-05  7:08                                                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-01-08  4:56                                                                   ` Sanath S
2024-01-10 14:32                                                                     ` Mika Westerberg
2024-01-04 16:49                                               ` Sanath S
2024-01-05  7:06                                                 ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231218131840.GH1074920@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Sanath.S@amd.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=sanaths2@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox