public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] xhci: process isoc TD properly when there was an error mid TD.
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:20:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116232045.76da750b@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116153618.2527463-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>

I applied your patch on v6.7 and it appears to be working. It removes
the disconnection spam and also handles intermittent transmission errors
on UVC without obvious glitches or errors messages, except one xhci_dbg
added to confirm that I'm really hitting this edge case.

Anything else that might be worth testing?


I have a question, though. What happens if there is no next TD because
a mid TD error has occured on the last packet queued by the client? Is
there any mechanism to retire that stuck TD on a NEC host which submits
one mid TD error event and then goes silent?

Would it be possible to retire the TD right after the first failed TRB?
(I imagine difficulties in determining when exactly the host has moved
its internal pointer past the remaining TRBs so they can be reused).


> -			if (!ep->skip ||
> -			    !usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(&td->urb->ep->desc)) {
> +			if (ep->skip && usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(&td->urb->ep->desc)) {
I like this. I would suggest another cleanup: the if(!ep_seg && stuf)
right above your change could be pulled inside if(!ep_seg).


> +			 * if there was an error event mid TD then host may not
> +			 * give an event for the last TRB on an isoc TD.
> +			 * This event can be for the next TD, See xHCI 4.9.1.
This seems to suggest that 4.9.1 encourages such behavior, but the
opposite is the case as far as I understand.


> +			if (td->error_mid_td) {
> +				struct xhci_td *td_next = list_next_entry(td, td_list);
This if needs && !list_is_last(&td->td_list, &ep_ring->td_list).

Otherwise a serious bug in the host (maybe in the driver too) tricks
us into grabbing a pointer to ep_ring instead, filling the subsequent
"TRB not part of current TD" message with mystifying garbage numbers.


> +				if (ep_seg) {
> +					/* give back previous TD, start handling new */
Suggested:
> +					xhci_dbg(xhci, "Missing completion event after mid TD error\n");


Thanks,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-16 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-12 22:52 "Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD" spam after USB disconnection Michał Pecio
2024-01-13 20:47 ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-14 14:06   ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-15 13:58     ` Mathias Nyman
2024-01-15 16:27       ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-16 15:36         ` [RFT PATCH] xhci: process isoc TD properly when there was an error mid TD Mathias Nyman
2024-01-16 22:20           ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2024-01-17 10:46             ` Mathias Nyman
2024-01-17 17:49               ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-18 11:00                 ` Isochronous error handling bug on VIA VL805 Michał Pecio
2024-01-18 11:10                   ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-18 13:54                   ` Mathias Nyman
2024-01-18 13:56                     ` [RFT PATCH v2] xhci: process isoc TD properly when there was an error mid TD Mathias Nyman
2024-01-18 22:16                       ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-19 10:49                         ` Mathias Nyman
2024-01-19 10:58                           ` [RTF PATCH v3] " Mathias Nyman
2024-01-19 21:54                             ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-22  9:03                               ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-22 13:37                                 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-01-22 17:10                                   ` Michał Pecio
2024-01-22 11:47                               ` Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240116232045.76da750b@foxbook \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox