From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0BC182AE; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712299396; cv=none; b=PjhdXhjUJm5Mws11EbTZxMlwf58XwY+f0iizNgbUSOKhJ5MOP4ntGo2dAryR7Z4iONgBe9wVcajdmQuWwUA9ZiMX7GWfKgQM9zg67DUnWBe30Pc59VMXajNaZ2cFtYzttWyhGwj/a+E6hRDBNQRaCP5mcyMxJr1/wj+iR9Jovdo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712299396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tDW09LKNuTg7VM0d3/LgA++2+IuvIT7d0NN9Qin8xJQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oi2lbcScjgyhfkEzjsb5RZxcgPEMrEzgUE9l5KZ+rEdA7DP5MnT2MxgAZe8B+W/xGNnpNduZPdONQ1Ze0NmFQHyACbG4SRIs2eOXDMAgRseNAxY8Hclt3IPqnzJ1UdCw91b8NTQDLgDjIh75rNfit5Ax7VwJ0C36j/4DEKEFVQg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C749268D07; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:43:11 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , Damien Le Moal , Niklas Cassel , Takashi Sakamoto , Sathya Prakash , Sreekanth Reddy , Suganath Prabu Subramani , "Juergen E. Fischer" , Xiang Chen , HighPoint Linux Team , Tyrel Datwyler , Brian King , Lee Duncan , Chris Leech , Mike Christie , John Garry , Jason Yan , Kashyap Desai , Sumit Saxena , Shivasharan S , Chandrakanth patil , Jack Wang , Nilesh Javali , GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alan Stern , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/23] scsi_transport_fc: add a max_bsg_segments field to struct fc_function_template Message-ID: <20240405064311.GE3480@lst.de> References: <20240402130645.653507-1-hch@lst.de> <20240402130645.653507-6-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:56:45AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 4/2/24 06:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> ibmvfc only supports a single segment for BSG FC passthrough. Instead of >> having it set a queue limits after creating the BSD queues, add a field so > ^^^ > BSG? Yes, thanks.