From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: qiang.zhang@windriver.com, ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: printer: fix races against disable
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:40:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620114039.5767-1-oneukum@suse.com> (raw)
printer_read() and printer_write() guard against the race
against disable() by checking the dev->interface flag,
which in turn is guarded by a spinlock.
These functions, however, drop the lock on multiple occasions.
This means that the test has to be redone after reacquiring
the lock and before doing IO.
Add the tests.
This also addresses CVE-2024-25741
Fixes: 7f2ca14d2f9b9 ("usb: gadget: function: printer: Interface is disabled and returns error")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
index 4c0b7c2970f1..44e20c6c36d3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
@@ -450,11 +450,8 @@ printer_read(struct file *fd, char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
mutex_lock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
- if (dev->interface < 0) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
/* We will use this flag later to check if a printer reset happened
* after we turn interrupts back on.
@@ -462,6 +459,9 @@ printer_read(struct file *fd, char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
dev->reset_printer = 0;
setup_rx_reqs(dev);
+ /* this dropped the lock - need to retest */
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
bytes_copied = 0;
current_rx_req = dev->current_rx_req;
@@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ printer_read(struct file *fd, char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
wait_event_interruptible(dev->rx_wait,
(likely(!list_empty(&dev->rx_buffers))));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
}
/* We have data to return then copy it to the caller's buffer.*/
@@ -538,6 +540,9 @@ printer_read(struct file *fd, char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
return -EAGAIN;
}
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
+
/* If we not returning all the data left in this RX request
* buffer then adjust the amount of data left in the buffer.
* Othewise if we are done with this RX request buffer then
@@ -567,6 +572,11 @@ printer_read(struct file *fd, char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
return bytes_copied;
else
return -EAGAIN;
+
+out_disabled:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
static ssize_t
@@ -587,11 +597,8 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
mutex_lock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
- if (dev->interface < 0) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
/* Check if a printer reset happens while we have interrupts on */
dev->reset_printer = 0;
@@ -614,6 +621,8 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
wait_event_interruptible(dev->tx_wait,
(likely(!list_empty(&dev->tx_reqs))));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
}
while (likely(!list_empty(&dev->tx_reqs)) && len) {
@@ -663,6 +672,9 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
return -EAGAIN;
}
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
+
list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs_active);
/* here, we unlock, and only unlock, to avoid deadlock. */
@@ -675,6 +687,8 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
return -EAGAIN;
}
+ if (dev->interface < 0)
+ goto out_disabled;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
@@ -686,6 +700,11 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
return bytes_copied;
else
return -EAGAIN;
+
+out_disabled:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
static int
--
2.45.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 11:40 Oliver Neukum [this message]
2024-06-20 12:28 ` [PATCH] usb: gadget: printer: fix races against disable Greg KH
2024-06-20 13:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2024-06-20 13:34 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620114039.5767-1-oneukum@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox