From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C574437A; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719337843; cv=none; b=aCaTZc/QOvMHVtyfETMXDmEvQfcj8/E9z4QltyUaNaqGhJ/KYaSSZe8Uh7NSVbAaljH316rnqEjhxzrVh3G++WARumzM+srjr+ZOSqHE6MxpLQ3NUS8DRoS2Ljov6/eTwuDPFnD9UO212ov15eAm+fKG0quYCYyzKSsIhLZ/RfM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719337843; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nKGtI5DQAQbPa7PCl4AKkwhGC8y1ysgMGXwp2yijK6A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ds6QckiEyqBT1VzC47DY/E4tPQtfXiv7GdEKfZYScbYLgxj4HUAvRgmlZQZjoijms89AvjWpVDlRBtLyxjrNGKsaf6D9E3/lbMimx0LCW8JnkqoiN2VRIJ12ue1ZpjJBC7NJQ4JAgJ+472zXMqO8Nl6g2/vF2Is7VkrF6SGqsXo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=PHev+RdD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="PHev+RdD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE7FAC32781; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:50:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719337843; bh=nKGtI5DQAQbPa7PCl4AKkwhGC8y1ysgMGXwp2yijK6A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PHev+RdD5y9FD5ePcNmPMUlFhH4xKI8lpOzBLbm2gA73CtrfC6Vzc9Wnzwe6N+JP7 QtfzqjK3HnX0l6YONdoILBiYCY/MisWejYm1mpH3QbwunWHiJhr1yC99OxX3LPLBM/ BZtkVXvFqh8wNYlcA2rz0TiA1gVnXxYYqkncRRcw= Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:50:47 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Lizhe Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, hgajjar@de.adit-jv.com, stanley_chang@realtek.com, ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: hub:no need to obtain usb device Message-ID: <2024062539-follow-drank-66b4@gregkh> References: <20240625164607.3367-1-sensor1010@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240625164607.3367-1-sensor1010@163.com> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:46:07AM -0700, Lizhe wrote: > the usb device connected to the port has obtained. > there is no need to obtain it again. > > Signed-off-by: Lizhe > --- > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > index 4b93c0bd1d4b..f37b991fa86a 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > @@ -5358,7 +5358,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus, > if (udev) { > if (hcd->usb_phy && !hdev->parent) > usb_phy_notify_disconnect(hcd->usb_phy, udev->speed); > - usb_disconnect(&port_dev->child); > + usb_disconnect(&udev); How was this tested?