public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Olivier Dautricourt <olivierdautricourt@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, mathias.nyman@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: xhci_setup_port_arrays: early -ENODEV if maxports is 0.
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:05:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004230516.5eb3f7a4@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwA-n56XlNkkLNXM@freebase>

> That is correct, the case is handled without panic, but the 0 value
> gets silently propagated until it eventually fails on line 2220:
> 	if (xhci->usb2_rhub.num_ports == 0 && xhci->usb3_rhub.num_ports == 0) {
>              xhci_warn(xhci, "No ports on the roothubs?\n");
>              return -ENODEV;
> 	}
> The benefits are only:
>   - Reporting a more precise issue
>   - Avoids iterating through the capability structures of the
>     controller
>   - failsafe if future changes

Well, simplifying things is not bad in principle, but in this case it
looks like this patch adds a branch and some 50 bytes of code/data for
the sake of optimizing something with no practical relevance (any such
hardware is useless, rejected by this driver, and violates the spec).

So, maybe just not worth the cost, no matter how small ;)

Regards,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-30  5:23 [PATCH] usb: xhci: xhci_setup_port_arrays: early -ENODEV if maxports is 0 Olivier Dautricourt
2024-10-04  8:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-04 19:04   ` Olivier Dautricourt
2024-10-04 10:57 ` Michał Pecio
2024-10-04 19:14   ` Olivier Dautricourt
2024-10-04 21:05     ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2024-10-10 12:50     ` Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241004230516.5eb3f7a4@foxbook \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=olivierdautricourt@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox