From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DADF84DF8; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 05:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729574077; cv=none; b=NbTVkOG7G/4bBQXJum2nAomYQEpibnCjeqqCmDNyWdBfVguPB3G8quOtLw2ZICQ3AhVscjVUXSFB+OnHHoI671bz9sPqM/HrJ8u9pcRrCZ1dTCQK+25K0ExvFsCMnr1+2E69zESLoJ9EktA6oGiYp5+DnznTqJQYUcqLU49kDhE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729574077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1jkNlwMF4vkDOF+NAig94pV+JFYv3I+EouVkRAryLIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a+CPL47l9bVq04XnEIncJPa3UMa9xIxZJJ6MQJtw8pxN2g4c4tAQiN9KUyCjuq+LBBMHhG14w1X0p8oaA41naFFrvkklyaIH8iT33dT65tqGj7EACyvOEOyndDKbj29gDjqJJ+nClssrdswAfbKtsesSUDZTLjdEMNFCi4gYZ6w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=jvBrUj0r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="jvBrUj0r" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C52F9C4CEC3; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 05:14:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1729574076; bh=1jkNlwMF4vkDOF+NAig94pV+JFYv3I+EouVkRAryLIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jvBrUj0rq78ucLBXAjb54jQLXXn05hvFy3MMulvN4EsytoOEKhLsItEwy+6fqDxVp PaPA4+IUQs8viN2t7ZoC8ebM3DqxHYnpNCdjNeZ346/d6fbpkpqyjLzY5BmkUtmo0j /QVZfmybmRt9qh50yLR23d+NKWRQyZEEhRv1CaRA= Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:14:26 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Amit Sunil Dhamne Cc: robh@kernel.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, badhri@google.com, kyletso@google.com, rdbabiera@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/2] Add support for time DT property in TCPM Message-ID: <2024102250-citric-dropout-17c7@gregkh> References: <20240925031135.1101048-1-amitsd@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Amit Sunil Dhamne wrote: > Hi, > > I had a process related question. Once an RFC patchset gets a Reviewed-by > tag, do I need to send a formal [PATCH] or is an RFC patch sufficient for > being accepted? You need to send a real series (and please do not top-post), for it to be considered for being accepted. thanks, greg k-h