From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Rechberger <linuxusb.ml@sundtek.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Highly critical bug in XHCI Controller
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:12:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024111731-neuter-customer-0230@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd4239c7b0538e1cd2f2a85307c73299117d5f0e.camel@sundtek.de>
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 08:44:16PM +0800, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Basically the issue comes from hub_port_connect.
>
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>
> hub_port_init returns -71 -EPROTO and jumps to loop
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L5450
>
> I'd question if usb_ep0_reinit is really required in loop which is
> running following functions:
> usb_disable_endpoint(udev, 0 + USB_DIR_IN, true);
> usb_disable_endpoint(udev, 0 + USB_DIR_OUT, true);
> usb_enable_endpoint(udev, &udev->ep0, true);
>
> this is something only experience over the past decades can tell?
>
> usb_enable_endpoint will trigger xhci_endpoint_reset which doesn't do
> much, but crashes the entire system with the upstream kernel when it
> triggers xhci_check_bw_table).
>
> I removed usb_ep0_reinit here and devices are still workable under
> various conditions (again I shorted and pulled D+/D- to ground for
> testing).
> The NULL PTR check in xhci_check_bw_table would be a second line of
> defense but as indicated in the first mail it shouldn't even get there.
>
>
>
> As a second issue I found in usb_reset_and_verify device
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L6131
>
> ret = hub_port_init(parent_hub, udev, port1, i, &descriptor);
> if (ret >= 0 || ret == -ENOTCONN || ret == -ENODEV) {
> break;
> }
>
> hub_port_init can also return -71 / -EPROTO, the cases should be very
> rare when usb_reset_and_verify_device is triggered and that happens.
>
>
> I'm just waiting for comments now since this is some critical piece of
> infrastructure code before proceeding with a patch.
Send us a patch and we will be glad to review it.
thanks!
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-17 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-17 7:33 Highly critical bug in XHCI Controller Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 12:44 ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 13:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-11-17 14:35 ` Michał Pecio
2024-11-17 15:03 ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 15:18 ` Alan Stern
2024-11-17 15:47 ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 21:02 ` Alan Stern
2024-11-18 5:14 ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-18 16:03 ` Alan Stern
2024-11-18 21:23 ` Michał Pecio
2024-11-17 13:12 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024111731-neuter-customer-0230@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxusb.ml@sundtek.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).