linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Rechberger <linuxusb.ml@sundtek.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Highly critical bug in XHCI Controller
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:12:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024111731-neuter-customer-0230@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd4239c7b0538e1cd2f2a85307c73299117d5f0e.camel@sundtek.de>

On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 08:44:16PM +0800, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Basically the issue comes from hub_port_connect.
> 
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> 
> hub_port_init returns -71 -EPROTO and jumps to loop
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L5450
> 
> I'd question if usb_ep0_reinit is really required in loop which is
> running following functions:
>     usb_disable_endpoint(udev, 0 + USB_DIR_IN, true);
>     usb_disable_endpoint(udev, 0 + USB_DIR_OUT, true);
>     usb_enable_endpoint(udev, &udev->ep0, true);
> 
> this is something only experience over the past decades can tell?
> 
> usb_enable_endpoint will trigger xhci_endpoint_reset which doesn't do
> much, but crashes the entire system with the upstream kernel when it
> triggers xhci_check_bw_table).
> 
> I removed usb_ep0_reinit here and devices are still workable under
> various conditions (again I shorted and pulled D+/D- to ground for
> testing).
> The NULL PTR check in xhci_check_bw_table would be a second line of
> defense but as indicated in the first mail it shouldn't even get there.
> 
> 
> 
> As a second issue I found in usb_reset_and_verify device 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L6131
> 
>         ret = hub_port_init(parent_hub, udev, port1, i, &descriptor);
>         if (ret >= 0 || ret == -ENOTCONN || ret == -ENODEV) {
>             break;
>         }
> 
> hub_port_init can also return -71 / -EPROTO, the cases should be very
> rare when usb_reset_and_verify_device is triggered and that happens.
> 
> 
> I'm just waiting for comments now since this is some critical piece of
> infrastructure code before proceeding with a patch.

Send us a patch and we will be glad to review it.

thanks!

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-17 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-17  7:33 Highly critical bug in XHCI Controller Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 12:44 ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 13:12   ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-11-17 14:35   ` Michał Pecio
2024-11-17 15:03     ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 15:18   ` Alan Stern
2024-11-17 15:47     ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-17 21:02       ` Alan Stern
2024-11-18  5:14         ` Markus Rechberger
2024-11-18 16:03           ` Alan Stern
2024-11-18 21:23           ` Michał Pecio
2024-11-17 13:12 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024111731-neuter-customer-0230@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxusb.ml@sundtek.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).