Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: fix pm usage counter imbalance in ucsi_ccg_sync_control()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 05:35:23PM +0800, GONG Ruiqi wrote:
> The error handling for the case `con_index == 0` should involve dropping
> the pm usage counter, as ucsi_ccg_sync_control() gets it at the
> beginning. Fix it.
> 
> Fixes: e56aac6e5a25 ("usb: typec: fix potential array underflow in ucsi_ccg_sync_control()")
> Signed-off-by: GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
> index fcb8e61136cf..740171f24ef9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_sync_control(struct ucsi *ucsi, u64 command)
>  			UCSI_CMD_CONNECTOR_MASK;
>  		if (con_index == 0) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> -			goto unlock;
> +			goto err_put;
>  		}
>  		con = &uc->ucsi->connector[con_index - 1];
>  		ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd(uc, con, &command);
> @@ -654,8 +654,8 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_sync_control(struct ucsi *ucsi, u64 command)
>  
>  	ret = ucsi_sync_control_common(ucsi, command);
>  
> +err_put:
>  	pm_runtime_put_sync(uc->dev);
> -unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&uc->lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot