public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
To: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: rework and simplify trb_in_td()
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2025 12:34:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206103428.1034784-4-niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206103428.1034784-1-niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>

Function trb_in_td() searches for a DMA address within a segment ring,
starting from 'start_seg'. If the DMA address is found within a segment
and is positioned between 'start_trb' and 'end_trb', the function returns
the segment. If not, it returns 'NULL'. See ring example at the end.

The original implementation is overly complex and suboptimal.

Key enhancements include:

- Utilize 'end_seg' pointer as counterpart to 'start_seg', narrowing the
  search scope from start to end segment, improving efficiency.

- Prioritizing the most frequent scenario where the start and end
  segments are identical, and 'start_trb' precedes end_trb', by
  checking this case first for quicker resolution.

- Clarifying the handling of TD wrap-around cases, where a TD spans
  back to the start segment, making start and end segments equal,
  but with 'end_trb' preceding 'start_trb', for better readability
  and maintainability.

============================= Example ====================================

Segment ring, consisting of 3 segments (A,B,C) each containing 3 TRBs
(1,2,3). Any segment can be start/end seg, and any TRB inside start seg
can be start TRB, vise versa.

      +---+   +---+   +---+
C --> | A |-->| B |-->| C |--> A
      +---+   +---+   +---+
        |       |       |
      +---+   +---+   +---+
      | 1 |   | 1 |   | 1 |
      | 2 |   | 2 |   | 2 |
      | 3 |   | 3 |   | 3 |
      +---+   +---+   +---+

Signed-off-by: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index a69972cc400c..23337c9d34c1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -281,51 +281,45 @@ static void inc_enq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_ring *ring,
  * If the suspect DMA address is a TRB in this TD, this function returns that
  * TRB's segment. Otherwise it returns 0.
  */
-static struct xhci_segment *trb_in_td(struct xhci_td *td, dma_addr_t suspect_dma)
+static struct xhci_segment *trb_in_td(struct xhci_td *td, dma_addr_t dma)
 {
-	dma_addr_t start_dma;
-	dma_addr_t end_seg_dma;
-	dma_addr_t end_trb_dma;
-	struct xhci_segment *cur_seg;
+	struct xhci_segment *seg = td->start_seg;
 
-	start_dma = xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->start_seg, td->start_trb);
-	cur_seg = td->start_seg;
-
-	do {
-		if (start_dma == 0)
-			return NULL;
-		/* We may get an event for a Link TRB in the middle of a TD */
-		end_seg_dma = xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(cur_seg,
-				&cur_seg->trbs[TRBS_PER_SEGMENT - 1]);
-		/* If the end TRB isn't in this segment, this is set to 0 */
-		end_trb_dma = xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(cur_seg, td->end_trb);
-
-		if (end_trb_dma > 0) {
-			/* The end TRB is in this segment, so suspect should be here */
-			if (start_dma <= end_trb_dma) {
-				if (suspect_dma >= start_dma && suspect_dma <= end_trb_dma)
-					return cur_seg;
-			} else {
-				/* Case for one segment with
-				 * a TD wrapped around to the top
-				 */
-				if ((suspect_dma >= start_dma &&
-							suspect_dma <= end_seg_dma) ||
-						(suspect_dma >= cur_seg->dma &&
-						 suspect_dma <= end_trb_dma))
-					return cur_seg;
-			}
+	if (td->start_seg == td->end_seg) {
+		if (td->start_trb <= td->end_trb) {
+			if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->start_seg, td->start_trb) <= dma &&
+			    dma <= xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->end_seg, td->end_trb))
+				return seg;
 			return NULL;
 		}
-		/* Might still be somewhere in this segment */
-		if (suspect_dma >= start_dma && suspect_dma <= end_seg_dma)
-			return cur_seg;
 
-		cur_seg = cur_seg->next;
-		start_dma = xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(cur_seg, &cur_seg->trbs[0]);
-	} while (cur_seg != td->start_seg);
+		/* Edge case, the TD wrapped around to the start segment. */
+		if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->end_seg, td->end_trb) < dma &&
+		    dma < xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->start_seg, td->start_trb))
+			return NULL;
+		if (seg->dma <= dma && dma <= (seg->dma + TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE))
+			return seg;
+		seg = seg->next;
+	}
 
-	return NULL;
+	/* Loop through segment which don't contain the DMA address. */
+	while (dma < seg->dma || (seg->dma + TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE) <= dma) {
+		if (seg == td->end_seg)
+			return NULL;
+
+		seg = seg->next;
+		if (seg == td->start_seg)
+			return NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (seg == td->start_seg) {
+		if (dma < xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->start_seg, td->start_trb))
+			return NULL;
+	} else if (seg == td->end_seg) {
+		if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(td->end_seg, td->end_trb) < dma)
+			return NULL;
+	}
+	return seg;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 10:34 [PATCH 0/4] usb: xhci: improve trb_in_td() Niklas Neronin
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] usb: xhci: refactor trb_in_td() to be static Niklas Neronin
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] usb: xhci: move debug capabilities from trb_in_td() to handle_tx_event() Niklas Neronin
2025-03-05  8:46   ` Michał Pecio
2025-03-05  9:17     ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-02-06 10:34 ` Niklas Neronin [this message]
2025-02-19  8:56   ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: rework and simplify trb_in_td() Michał Pecio
2025-02-19 14:25     ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-20 12:14     ` [PATCH 5/4 RFC] An alternative dma_in_range() implementation Michał Pecio
2025-02-20 13:18       ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-02-20 12:25     ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: rework and simplify trb_in_td() Neronin, Niklas
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] usb: xhci: modify trb_in_td() to be more modular Niklas Neronin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250206103428.1034784-4-niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox