From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, andre.draszik@linaro.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shufan_lee@richtek.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com, pablo.sun@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Unmask alert interrupts to fix functionality
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:47:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025021214-snowshoe-shortly-602d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212104040.38723-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:40:40AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> During probe, the TCPC alert interrupts are getting masked to
> avoid unwanted interrupts during chip setup: this is ok to do
> but there is no unmasking happening at any later time, which
> means that the chip will not raise any interrupt, essentially
> making it not functional as, while internally it does perform
> all of the intended functions, it won't signal anything to the
> outside.
>
> Unmask the alert interrupts to fix functionality.
>
> Fixes: ce08eaeb6388 ("staging: typec: rt1711h typec chip driver")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_rt1711h.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_rt1711h.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_rt1711h.c
> index 64f6dd0dc660..c71b213b2441 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_rt1711h.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_rt1711h.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ static int rt1711h_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> int ret;
> struct rt1711h_chip *chip;
> + const u16 alert_mask = TCPC_ALERT_TX_SUCCESS | TCPC_ALERT_TX_DISCARDED |
> + TCPC_ALERT_TX_FAILED | TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST |
> + TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS |
> + TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF |
> + TCPC_ALERT_FAULT;
>
> chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!chip)
> @@ -384,6 +389,11 @@ static int rt1711h_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return ret;
> enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
>
> + /* Enable alert interrupts */
> + ret = rt1711h_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, alert_mask);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please
follow the documented rules in the
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-12 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 10:40 [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Unmask alert interrupts to fix functionality AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-02-12 10:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-02-14 8:10 ` Greg KH
2025-02-19 11:40 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025021214-snowshoe-shortly-602d@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pablo.sun@mediatek.com \
--cc=shufan_lee@richtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox