Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] leds: ncp5623: Use fwnode_get_child_node_count()

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:54:53 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Since fwnode_get_child_node_count() was split from its device property
> counterpart, we may utilise it in the driver and drop custom implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/rgb/leds-ncp5623.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-ncp5623.c b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-ncp5623.c
> index f18156683375..7c7d44623a9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-ncp5623.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-ncp5623.c
> @@ -155,9 +155,9 @@ static int ncp5623_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>  	struct fwnode_handle *mc_node, *led_node;
>  	struct led_init_data init_data = { };
> -	int num_subleds = 0;
>  	struct ncp5623 *ncp;
>  	struct mc_subled *subled_info;
> +	unsigned int num_subleds;
I have no idea what the scheme is for ordering here. My gut
feeling would have been to leave it in original location but it's
not something I feel strongly about.


Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

>  	u32 color_index;
>  	u32 reg;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -172,8 +172,7 @@ static int ncp5623_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	if (!mc_node)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	fwnode_for_each_child_node(mc_node, led_node)
> -		num_subleds++;
> +	num_subleds = fwnode_get_child_node_count(mc_node);
>  
>  	subled_info = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_subleds, sizeof(*subled_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!subled_info) {