From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix Short Packet handling rework ignoring errors
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:18:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250314101850.0160fc14@foxbook> (raw)
A Short Packet event before the last TRB of a TD is followed by another
event on the final TRB on spec-compliant HCs, which is most of them.
A 'last_td_was_short' flag was added to know if a TD has just completed
as Short Packet and another event is to come. The flag was cleared after
seeing the event (unless no TDs are pending, but that's a separate bug)
or seeing a new TD complete as something other than Short Packet.
A rework replaced the flag with an 'old_trb_comp_code' variable. When
an event doesn't match the pending TD and the previous event was Short
Packet, the new event is silently ignored.
To preserve old behavior, 'old_trb_comp_code' should be cleared at this
point, but instead it is being set to current comp code, which is often
Short Packet again. This can cause more events to be silently ignored,
even though they are no longer connected with the old TD that completed
short and indicate a serious problem with the driver or the xHC.
Common device classes like UAC in async mode, UVC, serial or the UAS
status pipe complete as Short Packet routinely and could be affected.
Clear 'old_trb_comp_code' to zero, which is an invalid completion code
and the same value the variable starts with. This restores original
behavior on Short Packet and also works for illegal Etron events, which
the code has been extended to cover too.
Fixes: b331a3d8097f ("xhci: Handle spurious events on Etron host isoc enpoints")
Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 9e50cc3354cb..a35ad5489790 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@ static int handle_tx_event(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
if (xhci_spurious_success_tx_event(xhci, ep_ring)) {
xhci_dbg(xhci, "Spurious event dma %pad, comp_code %u after %u\n",
&ep_trb_dma, trb_comp_code, ep_ring->old_trb_comp_code);
- ep_ring->old_trb_comp_code = trb_comp_code;
+ ep_ring->old_trb_comp_code = 0;
return 0;
}
--
2.48.1
reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250314101850.0160fc14@foxbook \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox