From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT] usb: hcd: Add a usb_device argument to hc_driver.endpoint_reset()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415103836.0f748d63@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <657969a0-08c1-431a-b459-089c6d316a0f@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:13:50 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> The core does not explicitly flush endpoints before resetting a
> device. However, it does notify the class drivers' pre_reset
> callback, which is supposed to unlink all the URBs used by that
> driver. If a driver doesn't have a pre_reset callback, the core
> unbinds it from the device (which will unlink all its URBs). _If_
> everything is working properly, there shouldn't be any outstanding
> URBs when the reset takes place.
Thank you for clarification. This doesn't look too bad and I currently
have no concrete cases of the mechanism failing to work.
> Either way, though, the core doesn't invoke the HCD's endpoint_reset
> or endpoint_disable callback before the reset. If you think the core
> needs to do more, or needs to issue the callbacks in a different
> order, let me know.
The problem is a matter of mismatched expectations: the core treats
endpoint_disable() as temporary, because "classic" HCDs free their
ep->hcpriv and recreate it quietly on the next URBs submission. And
their endpoint_reset() during this time simply does nothing.
But xhci considers it more permanent, like the last thing before
drop_endpoint(). It too clears ep->hcpriv, but here hcpriv is not
the endpoint state, it's usb_device pointer saved by add_endpoint()
and required for operation. The driver drops it and it's screwed.
Moving all usb_disable_interface() calls before their corresponding
usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() would meet xhci expectations, but IDK if
it would work in general. As far as I see in usb_set_interface() for
example, the control request is only done after successful bandwidth
allocation and the interface swap only after a successful request.
My patch addresses the problem from xhci side, by adapting to core
expectations. As far as I see, only xhci_endpoint_reset() is broken
by this add_endpoint() -> endpoint_disable() sequence, so I fix it
by removing the dependence on ep->hcpriv. Alternatively, we could
stop clearing ep->hcpriv, but I'm not sure if it's reliable. No HCD
depends on ep->hcpriv being preserved after endpoint_disable().
I will do a v2 because Mathias expressed interest in this patch for
cleanup's sake alone, but the kernel test robot found build issues.
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 18:02 xhci: WARN Set TR Deq Ptr cmd failed due to incorrect slot or ep state Paul Menzel
2025-04-04 14:26 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-04-04 14:29 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-05 5:23 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-05 22:23 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-06 2:40 ` Alan Stern
2025-04-06 7:50 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-06 15:50 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-06 19:26 ` Alan Stern
2025-04-07 5:49 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-07 16:11 ` Alan Stern
2025-04-08 10:18 ` [PATCH RFC RFT] usb: hcd: Add a usb_device argument to hc_driver.endpoint_reset() Michał Pecio
2025-04-08 13:55 ` Mathias Nyman
2025-04-09 10:18 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-09 14:13 ` Alan Stern
2025-04-15 8:38 ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2025-04-07 7:15 ` xhci: WARN Set TR Deq Ptr cmd failed due to incorrect slot or ep state Mathias Nyman
2025-04-05 6:43 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-05 7:36 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-05 9:49 ` Michał Pecio
2025-04-05 14:08 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-05 18:13 ` Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415103836.0f748d63@foxbook \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox