From: "Peter Chen (CIX)" <peter.chen@kernel.org>
To: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: cdnsp: Fix issue with detecting command completion event
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:04:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512030417.GA208298@nchen-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR07MB953895BB387C725E701DCC0ADD8BA@PH7PR07MB9538.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
On 25-05-08 06:44:20, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> >In some cases, there is a small-time gap in which CMD_RING_BUSY can be
> >cleared by controller but adding command completion event to event ring will
> >be delayed. As the result driver will return error code.
> >This behavior has been detected on usbtest driver (test 9) with configuration
> >including ep1in/ep1out bulk and ep2in/ep2out isoc endpoint.
> >Probably this gap occurred because controller was busy with adding some
> >other events to event ring.
> >The CMD_RING_BUSY is cleared to '0' when the Command Descriptor has
> >been executed and not when command completion event has been added to
> >event ring.
> >
> >To fix this issue for this test the small delay is sufficient less than 10us) but to
> >make sure the problem doesn't happen again in the future the patch
> >introduce 3 retries to check with delay about 100us before returning error
> >code
> >
> >Fixes: 3d82904559f4 ("usb: cdnsp: cdns3 Add main part of Cadence USBSSP
> >DRD Driver")
> >cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Signed-off-by: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
> >---
> > drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-gadget.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-gadget.c b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-
> >gadget.c
> >index f773518185c9..0eb11b5dd9d3 100644
> >--- a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-gadget.c
> >+++ b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-gadget.c
> >@@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ int cdnsp_wait_for_cmd_compl(struct cdnsp_device
> >*pdev)
> > dma_addr_t cmd_deq_dma;
> > union cdnsp_trb *event;
> > u32 cycle_state;
> >+ u32 retry = 3;
> > int ret, val;
> > u64 cmd_dma;
> > u32 flags;
> >@@ -578,8 +579,23 @@ int cdnsp_wait_for_cmd_compl(struct cdnsp_device
> >*pdev)
> > flags = le32_to_cpu(event->event_cmd.flags);
> >
> > /* Check the owner of the TRB. */
> >- if ((flags & TRB_CYCLE) != cycle_state)
> >+ if ((flags & TRB_CYCLE) != cycle_state) {
> >+ /*
> >+ *Give some extra time to get chance controller
> >+ * to finish command before returning error code.
> >+ * Checking CMD_RING_BUSY is not sufficient because
> >+ * this bit is cleared to '0' when the Command
> >+ * Descriptor has been executed by controller
> >+ * and not when command completion event has
> >+ * be added to event ring.
> >+ */
> >+ if (retry--) {
> >+ usleep_range(90, 100);
>
> I was guided by the warning from checkpatch.pl script and changed udelay to usleep_range.
> It was wrong. In this place must be used udelay.
> I will give some time linux community for commenting and I will send it again in a few days.
>
Hi Pawel,
In the normal guide, the udelay is used for the delay less than 10us.
Checkpatch.pl may not check the execution environment (atomic vs
non-atomic), so you get that warning.
Please increase retry counter, and decrease the udelay value, the
atomic environment is expected to exit as soon as possible once the
hardware status has changed.
--
Best regards,
Peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250507063119.1914946-1-pawell@cadence.com>
2025-05-07 7:22 ` [PATCH] usb: cdnsp: Fix issue with detecting command completion event Pawel Laszczak
2025-05-08 6:44 ` Pawel Laszczak
2025-05-12 3:04 ` Peter Chen (CIX) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512030417.GA208298@nchen-desktop \
--to=peter.chen@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawell@cadence.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox