public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, oneukum@suse.com,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, hminas@synopsys.com,
	rui.silva@linaro.org, jgross@suse.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] USB: xhci: use urb hcpriv mempool for private data
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 10:32:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025052211-oxidizing-tannery-de3f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f14d11e4c651f9e856d760bc8b45ea7ac863b2f.1747897366.git.00107082@163.com>

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:10:10PM +0800, David Wang wrote:
> xhci keeps alloc/free private data for each enqueue/dequeue cycles,
> when using a USB webcam, allocation rate is ~250/s;
> when using a USB mic, allocation rate reaches ~1k/s;
> The more usb device in use, the higher allocation rate.
> 
> URB objects have longer lifespan than private data, hand over ownership
> of private data to urb can save lots of memory allocations over time.
> With this change, no extra memory allocation is needed during usages of
> USB webcam/mic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c  | 1 +
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c      | 8 +++-----
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> index d698095fc88d..b19e41cf1c4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> @@ -1745,6 +1745,7 @@ struct xhci_command *xhci_alloc_command_with_ctx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>  
>  void xhci_urb_free_priv(struct urb_priv *urb_priv)
>  {
> +	WARN_ONCE(1, "xhci private data should be managed by urb");

You just crashed the kernel if this ever gets hit.  As you are saying
this should never be called, why is this function even present anymore?

This makes no sense :(

Again, NEVER add a WARN*() call to the kernel for something that it
should be handling properly on its own.  Otherwise you just lost all the
user's data when the box got rebooted (and if userspace can trigger
this, you just created a new CVE...)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-22  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-22  7:09 [PATCH v4 1/2] USB: core: add a memory pool to urb caching host-controller private data David Wang
2025-05-22  7:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] USB: xhci: use urb hcpriv mempool for " David Wang
2025-05-22  8:32   ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-05-22  9:56     ` David Wang
2025-05-22  8:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] USB: core: add a memory pool to urb caching host-controller " Greg KH
2025-05-22  9:47   ` David Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025052211-oxidizing-tannery-de3f@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=rui.silva@linaro.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox