From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: "Neronin, Niklas" <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] usb: xhci-dbgcap: correct DMA address handling
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:15:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250910101539.2f65f797.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a905c139-c793-4715-8f48-38df4afde1ab@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:00:06 +0300, Neronin, Niklas wrote:
> dma_addr_t trb_dma - is a DMA address
> u64 ep_trb - is a 64-bit value, which, if correct, represents a DMA address.
Well, I guess that's true, but the inconsistency with the rest of the
driver looks odd.
And it is still a DMA space address, if it's any valid address at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 17:01 [PATCH 0/7] usb: xhci: enhancements to address printing Niklas Neronin
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] usb: xhci-dbgcap: correct DMA address handling Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 10:13 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-10 8:00 ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-09-10 8:15 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] usb: xhci: use '%pad' specifier for DMA address printing Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 9:59 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-09 11:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-09 20:44 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-10 5:56 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-11 7:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-11 9:34 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-11 20:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-12 9:46 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-12 18:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-13 8:12 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-15 7:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-15 10:22 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-15 12:32 ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-09-16 9:32 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-16 9:36 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-15 14:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-10 9:04 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-10 9:17 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] usb: xhci: improve Stream Context register debugging Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 9:23 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] usb: xhci: improve Endpoint " Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 9:20 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-09 10:24 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-15 12:45 ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] usb: xhci: improve Command Ring Control " Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 9:17 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-09 10:20 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] usb: xhci: improve Event Ring Dequeue Pointer Register debugging Niklas Neronin
2025-09-03 17:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] usb: xhci: standardize address format Niklas Neronin
2025-09-09 9:06 ` Michal Pecio
2025-09-15 13:24 ` Neronin, Niklas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250910101539.2f65f797.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox