From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56867224B09 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 11:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759922519; cv=none; b=HMxBUZtN+dQ5cSAwUXZJo/8jyhVU9r3fJyWSuQB9HGMiBxSiB8JgLOA2nZv9ZuDctpfaWFciS86+6coVoUytIl09ozw/Oy2THyTlZ+vHquX973pCCt+ch8JLISjZCf7zmh2cqetCJdMZnxhAp6xHIbym8JuXcpeeFEBX8aEnUic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759922519; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PckdGZ2olLGQ9qXZe59Psj3irDFstLgyvu3IEwEUT4c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AaH0D8jwnuJhq8XBjFhDmUUf9uJTDDiSAEGPQPQYk8wsc8tRLfp8yAjKe72AnccrQi0mPDuxY7m9wU7qKqNq8kdR+94QOLKBp9wV1N255iDQXnjCV+nn9d3h19cdEBW1afeqPrSZMEUB02pfu8zWe1W2SjcixwPrkTpd6x/e1mo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=WOV/emSg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="WOV/emSg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ADD6C4CEF4; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 11:21:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1759922518; bh=PckdGZ2olLGQ9qXZe59Psj3irDFstLgyvu3IEwEUT4c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WOV/emSgPcecYZWdZt61GoFFeSKJ5C2BY8VEfSgeixF+lmt4KZdoGgzIqVZWaPqjs YL+g0Ao9C9MPVm/hFWBb4fmh76G+Zo1SRttQfTfCRITZlJ97nf+ZsBlAVN3XLccoD2 ixSXTVpYZ5X1hFgIagjaV2TGoJGIABNCj3RwmmoM= Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:21:56 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Shi Hao Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] usb-storage: Fix comment indentation level Message-ID: <2025100802-sedan-security-3529@gregkh> References: <2025100845-engraver-perch-dabb@gregkh> <20251008110910.33833-1-i.shihao.999@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251008110910.33833-1-i.shihao.999@gmail.com> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 04:39:10PM +0530, Shi Hao wrote: > Fix comment indentation level . > > The previous comment was indented at the wrong level, breaking > kernel coding style consistency. The indentation has been corrected > to align with the relevant code block. This does not describe what this patch does. Please take a break, relax, and come back in a day or so and start from a "clean" tree to implement this after taking a look at the kernel documentation for how to submit patches again. You are making patches on top of patches, all of which will not work here. thanks, greg k-h