Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jimmy Hu <hhhuuu@google.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, badhri@google.com,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, royluo@google.com,
	Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com, balbi@ti.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: udc: fix race condition in usb_del_gadget
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 10:02:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025102212-selected-ovary-6259@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014085156.2651449-1-hhhuuu@google.com>

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:51:56AM +0000, Jimmy Hu wrote:
> A race condition during gadget teardown can lead to a use-after-free
> in usb_gadget_state_work(), as reported by KASAN:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in sysfs_notify+0_x_2c/0_x_d0
>   Workqueue: events usb_gadget_state_work
> 
> The fundamental race occurs because a concurrent event (e.g., an
> interrupt) can call usb_gadget_set_state() and schedule gadget->work
> at any time during the cleanup process in usb_del_gadget().
> 
> Commit 399a45e5237c ("usb: gadget: core: flush gadget workqueue after
> device removal") attempted to fix this by moving flush_work() to after
> device_del(). However, this does not fully solve the race, as a new
> work item can still be scheduled *after* flush_work() completes but
> before the gadget's memory is freed, leading to the same use-after-free.
> 
> This patch fixes the race condition robustly by introducing a 'teardown'
> flag and a 'state_lock' spinlock to the usb_gadget struct. The flag is
> set during cleanup in usb_del_gadget() *before* calling flush_work() to
> prevent any new work from being scheduled once cleanup has commenced.
> The scheduling site, usb_gadget_set_state(), now checks this flag under
> the lock before queueing the work, thus safely closing the race window.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Removed redundant inline comments as suggested by Alan Stern.

This goes below the --- line.

> 2.51.0.760.g7b8bcc2412-goog

This does not apply to my usb-linus branch, what kernel was it made
against?  Can you rebase and resubmit it based on that one?

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-22  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-14  8:51 [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: udc: fix race condition in usb_del_gadget Jimmy Hu
2025-10-14 14:38 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-22  8:02 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025102212-selected-ovary-6259@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=badhri@google.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=hhhuuu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=royluo@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox