* [PATCH 6.12.y] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null pointer access after ep enable.
@ 2025-11-04 3:49 guhuinan
2025-11-04 5:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: guhuinan @ 2025-11-04 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-usb, Al Viro, Ingo Rohloff,
Christian Brauner, Chen Ni, Peter Zijlstra, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov,
Akash M, Chenyu, Yudongbin, Mahongwei, Jiangdayu, Owen Gu
From: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
[ Upstream commit cfd6f1a7b42f ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null
pointer access after ep enable.") ]
A race condition occurs when ffs_func_eps_enable() runs concurrently
with ffs_data_reset(). The ffs_data_clear() called in ffs_data_reset()
sets ffs->epfiles to NULL before resetting ffs->eps_count to 0, leading
to a NULL pointer dereference when accessing epfile->ep in
ffs_func_eps_enable() after successful usb_ep_enable().
The ffs->epfiles pointer is set to NULL in both ffs_data_clear() and
ffs_data_close() functions, and its modification is protected by the
spinlock ffs->eps_lock. And the whole ffs_func_eps_enable() function
is also protected by ffs->eps_lock.
Thus, add NULL pointer handling for ffs->epfiles in the
ffs_func_eps_enable() function to fix issues
Signed-off-by: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250915092907.17802-1-guhuinan@xiaomi.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
index 08a251df20c4..04058261cdd0 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
@@ -2407,7 +2407,12 @@ static int ffs_func_eps_enable(struct ffs_function *func)
ep = func->eps;
epfile = ffs->epfiles;
count = ffs->eps_count;
- while(count--) {
+ if (!epfile) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ while (count--) {
ep->ep->driver_data = ep;
ret = config_ep_by_speed(func->gadget, &func->function, ep->ep);
@@ -2431,6 +2436,7 @@ static int ffs_func_eps_enable(struct ffs_function *func)
}
wake_up_interruptible(&ffs->wait);
+done:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&func->ffs->eps_lock, flags);
return ret;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null pointer access after ep enable.
2025-11-04 3:49 [PATCH 6.12.y] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null pointer access after ep enable guhuinan
@ 2025-11-04 5:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-11-05 2:33 ` Owen Gu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-11-04 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guhuinan
Cc: stable, linux-usb, Al Viro, Ingo Rohloff, Christian Brauner,
Chen Ni, Peter Zijlstra, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov, Akash M, Chenyu,
Yudongbin, Mahongwei, Jiangdayu
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 11:49:46AM +0800, guhuinan wrote:
> From: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit cfd6f1a7b42f ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null
> pointer access after ep enable.") ]
>
> A race condition occurs when ffs_func_eps_enable() runs concurrently
> with ffs_data_reset(). The ffs_data_clear() called in ffs_data_reset()
> sets ffs->epfiles to NULL before resetting ffs->eps_count to 0, leading
> to a NULL pointer dereference when accessing epfile->ep in
> ffs_func_eps_enable() after successful usb_ep_enable().
>
> The ffs->epfiles pointer is set to NULL in both ffs_data_clear() and
> ffs_data_close() functions, and its modification is protected by the
> spinlock ffs->eps_lock. And the whole ffs_func_eps_enable() function
> is also protected by ffs->eps_lock.
>
> Thus, add NULL pointer handling for ffs->epfiles in the
> ffs_func_eps_enable() function to fix issues
>
> Signed-off-by: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250915092907.17802-1-guhuinan@xiaomi.com
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
What about 6.17.y? You do not want to upgrade from 6.12 to a newer
kernel and have a regression.
And if this fixes a bug, why was it not marked with a Fixes: tag or a
cc: stable tag? Did I just miss that before?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null pointer access after ep enable.
2025-11-04 5:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-11-05 2:33 ` Owen Gu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Owen Gu @ 2025-11-05 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, linux-usb, Al Viro, Ingo Rohloff, Christian Brauner,
Chen Ni, Peter Zijlstra, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov, Akash M, Chenyu,
Yudongbin, Mahongwei, Jiangdayu
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 02:15:44PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 11:49:46AM +0800, guhuinan wrote:
> > From: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit cfd6f1a7b42f ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null
> > pointer access after ep enable.") ]
> >
> > A race condition occurs when ffs_func_eps_enable() runs concurrently
> > with ffs_data_reset(). The ffs_data_clear() called in ffs_data_reset()
> > sets ffs->epfiles to NULL before resetting ffs->eps_count to 0, leading
> > to a NULL pointer dereference when accessing epfile->ep in
> > ffs_func_eps_enable() after successful usb_ep_enable().
> >
> > The ffs->epfiles pointer is set to NULL in both ffs_data_clear() and
> > ffs_data_close() functions, and its modification is protected by the
> > spinlock ffs->eps_lock. And the whole ffs_func_eps_enable() function
> > is also protected by ffs->eps_lock.
> >
> > Thus, add NULL pointer handling for ffs->epfiles in the
> > ffs_func_eps_enable() function to fix issues
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Owen Gu <guhuinan@xiaomi.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250915092907.17802-1-guhuinan@xiaomi.com
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> What about 6.17.y? You do not want to upgrade from 6.12 to a newer
> kernel and have a regression.
>
> And if this fixes a bug, why was it not marked with a Fixes: tag or a
> cc: stable tag? Did I just miss that before?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg KH,
I noticed that the patch for version 6.17.y has already been submitted:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251025160905.3857885-311-sashal@kernel.org/
I apologize for forgetting to include the 'Fixes' tag in the previous
patch submission. Are there any corrective actions available now?
The fix reference is:
Fixes: ebe2b1add1055 ("usb: f_fs: Fix use-after-free for epfile")"
Thanks,
Owen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-05 2:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-04 3:49 [PATCH 6.12.y] usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix epfile null pointer access after ep enable guhuinan
2025-11-04 5:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-11-05 2:33 ` Owen Gu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).