From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Kyungtae Kim <Kyungtae.Kim@dartmouth.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: r8a66597-hcd: fix potential divide-by-zero in prepare_packet_read()
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 08:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026011117-surrender-dude-9f5b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAsoPpUv_G1Se_z9WRQ_4rHv=tiUW__eHU=03mytkdU9+kW1ag@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 02:25:54AM -0500, Seungjin Bae wrote:
> 2026년 1월 10일 (토) PM 3:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>님이
> 작성:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 02:22:33PM -0500, pip-izony wrote:
> > > From: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > The `prepare_packet_read()` function calculates the number of packets
> > > required for a transfer by dividing the transfer buffer length by the
> > > maximum packet size (`td->maxpacket`). The `td->maxpacket` is
> > > initialized in `r8a66597_make_td()` function based on the endpoint
> > > descriptor. However, it does not validate whether `td->maxpacket` is
> > > zero before using it in the `DIV_ROUND_UP` macro.
> > >
> > > If a malicious USB device sends a descriptor with `wMaxPacketSize` set to
> > > 0, it triggers a divide-by-zero exception (kernel panic).
> >
> > Same here, when can this happen, before a device is bound to the device
> > or afterward?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> This logic triggers after the driver is bound, specifically during the
> packet preparation phase.
>
> I checked `usb_parse_endpoint()` and confirmed that if `wMaxPacketSize`
> is 0, it only prints a warning and continues the binding process.
> It does not reject the device at that stage.
>
> However, I missed that `usb_submit_urb()` explicitly checks if
> `wMaxPacketSize` is 0 before calling the driver's enqueue function.
> Since the core rejects such requests with -EMSGSIZE, this code path
> is unreachable in practice.
That's great to verify, thanks for checking.
also, when writing a patch that says "this will fix a crash", please
verify that the tool that found this issue is actually correct and not
making things up. We have a lot of bad AI generated bug reports these
days, so be careful as we are getting much more sensitive to this.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-11 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-10 19:22 [PATCH] usb: r8a66597-hcd: fix potential divide-by-zero in prepare_packet_read() pip-izony
2026-01-10 20:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <CAAsoPpUv_G1Se_z9WRQ_4rHv=tiUW__eHU=03mytkdU9+kW1ag@mail.gmail.com>
2026-01-11 7:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026011117-surrender-dude-9f5b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Kyungtae.Kim@dartmouth.edu \
--cc=eeodqql09@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox