public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com,
	Raghavendra Thoorpu <rthoorpu@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] Prepwork for non-PCIe NHI/TBT hosts
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:40:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310054018.GS2275908@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309-topic-usb4_nonpcie_prepwork-v1-0-d901d85fc794@oss.qualcomm.com>

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:32:58AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, the NHI driver (and other parts of the TBT framework) make
> multiple assumptions about the host router being a PCIe device. This
> series tries to decouple them by moving the 'struct pci_device' out of
> the NHI code and introduce NHI-on-PCIe-specific abstractions where
> necessary (with no functional change).
> 
> The intended usage of the new nhi_probe_common() is pretty similar to
> other bus frameworks (I2C, SPI, USB..), i.e.:
> 
> static int foo_bar_probe() {
> 	// get SoC-specifc resources (clks, regulators..)
> 
> 	// power things on
> 
> 	// set some implementation-specific registers
> 
> 	// register NHI and all the sub-devices
> 	ret = nhi_probe_common(&my_usb4->nhi)

nhi_probe() is the "common".

Then pci.c and platform.c call it once they have their resources sorted
out.

> 
> 	// cleanup boilerplate
> }
> 
> Instead of the previously-suggested aux/fauxbus, the NHI device remains
> the same 'struct dev' as the PCIe/platform/[...] device that provides
> it. This is in line with some other buses and it makes things easier
> from the PM perspective.
> 
> Compile-tested only for the PCIe case. The Qualcomm USB4 driver that
> leverages this patchset is unfortunately still work in progress and
> will be shared at a later time. Nonetheless, we need to get this
> non-PCIe topic sorted.

Wanted to mention that please make sure you test the next version on PCIe
platform properly. I can test smaller changes but more intrusive changes
like this the I don't really have the bandwidth. If Qualcomm is sponsoring
this work I'm sure they can find you a Intel/AMD machine that you can use
(a regular IT laptop typically has USB4 ports).

> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Konrad Dybcio (3):
>       thunderbolt: Move pci_device out of tb_nhi
>       thunderbolt: Separate out common NHI bits
>       thunderbolt: Add some more descriptive probe error messages
> 
>  drivers/thunderbolt/Makefile    |   2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/acpi.c      |  14 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c       |  14 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c    |   2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/icm.c       |  25 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c       | 494 ++++++---------------------------------
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.h       |  32 +++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi_ops.c   |  31 ++-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi_pci.c   | 496 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi_pci.h   |  22 ++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c    |  41 +---
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c        |  76 +-----
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h        |  10 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/usb4_port.c |   2 +-
>  include/linux/thunderbolt.h     |   5 +-
>  16 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 569 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: fc7b1a72c6cd5cbbd989c6c32a6486e3e4e3594d
> change-id: 20260309-topic-usb4_nonpcie_prepwork-86881f769b8f
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09 10:32 [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] Prepwork for non-PCIe NHI/TBT hosts Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-09 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 1/3] thunderbolt: Move pci_device out of tb_nhi Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-09 11:49   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-03-09 10:33 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 2/3] thunderbolt: Separate out common NHI bits Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-09 11:51   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-03-09 10:33 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 3/3] thunderbolt: Add some more descriptive probe error messages Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-09 11:53   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-03-10  5:40 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310054018.GS2275908@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rthoorpu@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox