public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	"open list:QUALCOMM TYPEC PORT MANAGER DRIVER"
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other
	areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be)?b"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: simplify allocation
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:47:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031127-siding-caress-7ed9@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306222148.8200-1-rosenp@gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 02:21:48PM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Change kzalloc + kcalloc to just kzalloc with a flexible array member.
> 
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis when requested.
> 
> Shuffle some code in probe to provide a clearer picture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c   | 27 ++++++++-----------
>  .../typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c    | 26 ++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> index c8b1463e6e8b..4b3915c6894a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.c
> @@ -95,13 +95,13 @@ struct pmic_typec_pdphy {
>  	struct regmap			*regmap;
>  	u32				base;
>  
> -	unsigned int			nr_irqs;
> -	struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data	*irq_data;
> -
>  	struct work_struct		reset_work;
>  	struct work_struct		receive_work;
>  	struct regulator		*vdd_pdphy;
>  	spinlock_t			lock;		/* Register atomicity */
> +
> +	unsigned int			nr_irqs;
> +	struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data	irq_data[] __counted_by(nr_irqs);
>  };
>  
>  static void qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_reset_on(struct pmic_typec_pdphy *pmic_typec_pdphy)
> @@ -560,31 +560,26 @@ int qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	struct pmic_typec_pdphy_irq_data *irq_data;
>  	int i, ret, irq;
>  
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic_typec_pdphy), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!pmic_typec_pdphy)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
>  	if (!res->nr_irqs || res->nr_irqs > PMIC_PDPHY_MAX_IRQS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	irq_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, res->nr_irqs, sizeof(*irq_data),
> -				GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!irq_data)
> +	pmic_typec_pdphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(pmic_typec_pdphy, irq_data, res->nr_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);

extra long line, checkpatch.pl didn't complain about this?

> +	if (!pmic_typec_pdphy)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	pmic_typec_pdphy->nr_irqs = res->nr_irqs;
> +	pmic_typec_pdphy->dev = dev;
> +	pmic_typec_pdphy->base = base;
> +	pmic_typec_pdphy->regmap = regmap;
>  	pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd-pdphy");
>  	if (IS_ERR(pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy))
>  		return PTR_ERR(pmic_typec_pdphy->vdd_pdphy);
>  
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy->dev = dev;
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy->base = base;
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy->regmap = regmap;
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy->nr_irqs = res->nr_irqs;
> -	pmic_typec_pdphy->irq_data = irq_data;
>  	spin_lock_init(&pmic_typec_pdphy->lock);
>  	INIT_WORK(&pmic_typec_pdphy->reset_work, qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy_sig_reset_work);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < res->nr_irqs; i++, irq_data++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < res->nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		irq_data = &pmic_typec_pdphy->irq_data[i];
>  		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, res->irq_params[i].irq_name);
>  		if (irq < 0)
>  			return irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c
> index 8051eaa46991..7c5cf8061f04 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec_port.c

Can you just convert one driver at a time please?  This should be a
patch series.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06 22:21 [PATCH] usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: simplify allocation Rosen Penev
2026-03-07  7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-07  7:54   ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-11 14:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-11 18:54   ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-12  5:04     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026031127-siding-caress-7ed9@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox