public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"michal.pecio@gmail.com" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
	"oneukum@suse.com" <oneukum@suse.com>,
	"niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com" <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] xhci: prevent automatic endpoint restart after stall or error
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 01:59:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403015950.lx4n4zdqki37dy27@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07351d72-5cdb-45e8-90af-311a0dc49718@rowland.harvard.edu>

On Wed, Apr 01, 2026, stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 01:08:31AM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > On 3/31/26 18:31, stern@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
> > > 
> > > How about this instead?  We add a "halted" flag to the usb_host_endpoint
> > > structure, and the core will set this flag whenever a bulk or interrupt
> > > URB gets a status other than 0 (before putting the URB on the bh list).
> > > If an URB has one of these statuses, when its completion handler returns
> > > the core will unlink all the URBs queued to the same endpoint.  Finally,
> > > the "halted" flag should be cleared after a completion handler returns
> > > if there are no more unlinked URBs still in the queue or URBs waiting on
> > > the bh list to be given back.
> > > 
> > > The result of this is that any URB remaining in the queue when the flag
> > > is cleared must have been submitted by the class driver _after_ the
> > > failing URB's completion handler has run.  We can assume the class
> > > driver knows what it's doing in this case.
> > > 
> > > The endpoint queue shouldn't be restarted until the "halted" flag is
> > > cleared.  Either right away, if there are any URBs in the queue, or not
> > > until the next URB is submitted.  Doing this might require a new HCD
> > > callback.  (It would also mean the kerneldoc for usb_unlink_urb() would
> > > need to be updated, because the endpoint might restart before all the
> > > completion handlers for the unlinked URBs have run.)
> > > 
> > > What I'm trying to do here is come up with a single, consistent proposal
> > > for exactly when halted endpoint queues should restart.  Maybe someone
> > > else has a better suggestion.
> > 
> > Sounds like a possible solution to me.
> > 
> > Just to clarify, core should unlink the remaining URBs queued to that endpoint
> > after setting the "halted" flag, but before URB completion is called.
> 
> Above I wrote that the remaining URBs should be unlinked _after_ the 
> completion handler is called.  If we did the unlinks before then the 
> class driver might submit a new URB after the unlinks were finished and 
> before the completion handler learned about the transaction error, and 
> this new URB then wouldn't get unlinked.
> 
> It's a race between completion of one URB and submission of another.
> 
> > "Halted" flag should be cleared after URB completion returns, and endpoint
> > should be restarted if there are any pending URBs.
> 
> To be clear, the flag should be cleared after the completion handlers 
> for _all_ the unlinked URBs (as well as the URB getting the original 
> error) have returned.
> 
> > This allows the class driver URB completion handler to re-queue the halted URB
> > without core unlinking it.
> 
> The completion handler shouldn't do this, because it would mean 
> resubmitting without doing a clear-halt first.  (Completion handlers 
> can't do clear-halts because they run in atomic context.)  If it does 
> try to do this anyway, I see nothing wrong with the core unlinking the 
> resubmitted URB.
> 
> (Are you going to ask about verification tests that set the endpoint's 
> Halt feature, submit an URB, wait for it to fail with -EPIPE, and then 
> submit another URB from within the completion handler?  :-) )
> 

How about this:

Introduce a halted flag the following conditions:

* Introduce the halted flag in usb_host_endpoint
* The halted flag must be implemented as a bit in a unsigned long so
  we can use atomic bit operation
* Only the HCD may set the halted flag, and only upon checking the
  first URB completing with a halted status
* Only the USB core may clear the halted flag, and only after
  usb_reset_endpoint returns (this makes sure the HCD drained and reset
  the endpoint before the flag is cleared and new URBs are accepted)
* The usb_reset_endpoint must be called after clear-halt, SetInterface,
  and SetConfiguration.
* The USB core will not attempt to unlink pending URBs due to halted
  condition
* The HCD is responsible for completing or canceling queued URBs
  when the halted flag is set. Cancelled and newly submitted URBs will
  be returned with -EPIPE as long as the halted flag is set
* The class driver is responsible to check the halted flag to
  determine whether to initiate error recovery via usb_clear_halt

I'm trying to keep a clear separation of responsibilities between HCD
and the USB core. Also, I try to keep the halted flag more closely match
the state of the endpoint. 

Let me know what you think?

BR,
Thinh

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-23 12:25 [RFC PATCH 0/2] fix xhci endpoint restart at EPROTO Mathias Nyman
2026-03-23 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] xhci: prevent automatic endpoint restart after stall or error Mathias Nyman
2026-03-25  1:52   ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-03-25  9:38     ` Mathias Nyman
2026-03-26  1:19       ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-03-26 11:25         ` Mathias Nyman
2026-03-26 23:24           ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-03-30 12:51             ` Mathias Nyman
2026-03-30 14:17               ` stern
2026-03-31  9:34                 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-03-31 15:31                   ` stern
2026-04-01 22:08                     ` Mathias Nyman
2026-04-02  2:36                       ` stern
2026-04-03  1:59                         ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2026-04-03  2:42                           ` stern
2026-04-03  8:51                             ` Michal Pecio
2026-04-03 14:55                               ` stern
2026-04-03 19:13                                 ` xhci-hcd and URB_SHORT_NOT_OK Michal Pecio
2026-04-03 20:17                                   ` stern
2026-04-04  1:15                             ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] xhci: prevent automatic endpoint restart after stall or error Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-04  1:54                               ` stern
2026-04-04 20:41                                 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-04 21:54                                   ` Alan Stern
2026-04-04 22:15                                     ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-04 22:28                                       ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-05  1:30                                         ` Alan Stern
2026-04-05  3:10                                           ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-07 15:23                                             ` Alan Stern
2026-04-07 20:24                                               ` Mathias Nyman
2026-04-17 17:38                                                 ` Alan Stern
2026-04-17 21:48                                                   ` Michal Pecio
2026-04-18  2:34                                                     ` Alan Stern
2026-04-18  9:21                                                       ` Michal Pecio
2026-04-18 14:56                                                         ` Alan Stern
2026-04-01 22:08               ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-04-01 22:34                 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-04-01 22:47                   ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-03-23 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] xhci: Ensure URB is given back when endpoint halts on a multi-TD URB Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403015950.lx4n4zdqki37dy27@synopsys.com \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox