From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9E3330D23; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777397080; cv=none; b=NsQZ74yoA8wKi+AS4j05l7FWmEUVw/PXeg65fCYcbDOCtpeDk+DSmm74Z2wste0a4V0IsPy3l2pb166Cn96/079rYXrVt7Dx83zQxFX5wr1v399LzCKPpFa+Xo/RgF1LxGYWBd/C/pg4ke/3T23UEoT+gvfXd+LiYr/ElnGOCcw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777397080; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ks+zy8T12Y6GZ3FyFHq88+2s6itPF5th9+YzVmFMPwo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fYcyrl1Ywuvm0D7KWqTK8AjI/SQPwd6quWgrzvw+nIhNlGTar4cUP2oXrAb9HNhzk9yy3LWXNzIDsVWrMcY9b5tVhKWFnwyz+2yi3nfv3dcRtZ3lwWquPnLjYv1Z3OD3boVOg5e8udWLQ5phCEJYL5U1Q3NhU5Y2s+QTf5OdDVg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=R2IgLQxS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="R2IgLQxS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777397079; x=1808933079; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ks+zy8T12Y6GZ3FyFHq88+2s6itPF5th9+YzVmFMPwo=; b=R2IgLQxSfHSMOetaOaavA3GFn4ASvAy6m1/dhfb0zUqc4t2VRDBt5UEV Pv0d6mvf+2ptWhOEpJVFsFfxWbIcndxxmS/Nf/vRbtfuiKKDp2f+FYAMN 7ERHOpJ4pC60+v57+o0Qvsmp2gQI2KuobvowXj0oCASlKjcHwuiCz3EUh ArD90Nq30hlZrpKQ23DsSZcS1PzkR0/XpfuJbITM+yfyVxZdt71nyKKbj QUffEnsm4fqd2wC9nNPKvQdBxipaGOW8os3i5vu9e+/UhjWjH2H/waEEH BpCZ3pAOuNsQnusaSQiFrIFrsSKaOHGz3zYCSOqipmftSYKNnXJC8pNWa A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uNC1CH1MTNWXkM1yM1HR6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ELZld8VHSg2N4c/KvTyc8Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11770"; a="78230536" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,204,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="78230536" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2026 10:24:38 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yh4CqZhkQu2gGGaQsgX3aw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: whgKWaQlQJuBDL0j66PmVg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,204,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="272157200" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2026 10:24:35 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 375A595; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:24:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:24:34 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andrew Lunn Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Yehezkel Bernat , Lukas Wunner , Andreas Noever , Alan Borzeszkowski , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] thunderbolt: Add support for USB4STREAM Message-ID: <20260428172434.GV557136@black.igk.intel.com> References: <20260428072209.3084930-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20260428072209.3084930-10-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20260428151311.GU557136@black.igk.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 06:45:34PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > Is this mutually exclusive to networking, on a device? > > > > No - they can co-exist. > > Do they have there own rings? So that ethtool -C on the netdev will > not conflict with your configfs setting of the interrupt coalescing > for the stream? Yes they use their own rings.