Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thunderbolt: prevent XDomain delayed work use-after-free on disconnect
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 12:08:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528100840.GF3102@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527114604.1197561-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 07:46:04AM -0400, Michael Bommarito wrote:
> tb_xdp_handle_request() runs on system_wq and queues
> xd->state_work via queue_delayed_work() in three request handlers:
> PROPERTIES_CHANGED_REQUEST, UUID_REQUEST (via start_handshake),
> and LINK_STATE_CHANGE_REQUEST.  Similarly, update_xdomain() queues
> xd->properties_changed_work when local properties change.
> 
> Concurrently, tb_xdomain_remove() calls stop_handshake() which does
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() on both delayed works.  Later,
> tb_xdomain_unregister() calls device_unregister() which eventually
> frees the xdomain.  Since commit 559c1e1e0134 ("thunderbolt: Run
> tb_xdp_handle_request() in system workqueue") moved the request
> handler off tb->wq, the handler and the remove path are no longer
> serialized.  If queue_delayed_work() executes after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() but before the xdomain is freed, the
> delayed work fires on a freed object.
> 
> Add xd->removing that tb_xdomain_remove() sets under xd->lock
> before calling stop_handshake().  Each external queue site holds
> the same lock and checks removing before calling
> queue_delayed_work().  This provides the mutual exclusion needed:
> either the queue site acquires the lock first and queues work that
> the subsequent cancel will see, or the remove path acquires the
> lock first and the queue site observes removing == true and skips
> the queue.
> 
> Fixes: 559c1e1e0134 ("thunderbolt: Run tb_xdp_handle_request() in system workqueue")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Rebased onto thunderbolt.git/next per Mika's request. Verified
>     the race persists on next: tb_xdp_handle_request still runs on
>     system_wq, the remove/unregister split does not add
>     synchronization with the queue sites. Updated commit message to
>     reflect that tb_xdomain_unregister() now does the
>     device_unregister (split from tb_xdomain_remove on next).

Thanks Michael! Applied to thunderbolt.git/next. I would like to keep this
one for a while in linux-next and then send it with the rest for v7.2-rc1
where stable folks can then pick it up.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 12:57 [PATCH] thunderbolt: prevent XDomain delayed work use-after-free on disconnect Michael Bommarito
2026-05-26 13:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-05-27 11:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Bommarito
2026-05-28 10:08   ` Mika Westerberg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260528100840.GF3102@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox