From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: me@samcday.com
Cc: Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Hongren Zheng <i@zenithal.me>,
Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>,
Igor Kotrasinski <i.kotrasinsk@samsung.com>,
Karol Kosik <karo9@interia.eu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue()
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:12:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026062518-treason-styling-5185@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620-usbip-vudc-deque-fix-v2-1-d1913ab4611b@samcday.com>
On Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 10:18:09AM +1000, Sam Day via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Sam Day <me@samcday.com>
>
> vep_alloc_request() wasn't initializing vrequest->udc, so cancellations
> on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid
> UDC reference.
>
> Since vrequest->udc is never actually properly used anywhere, we opt to
> remove it, and update vep_dequeue to obtain a reference to the udc with
> ep_to_vudc(), consistent with the other vep_ ops.
>
> AFAICT this bug has existed for ~10 years. Seems that nobody has really
> stressed the FunctionFS AIO path on usbip's vudc.
>
> I tested this fix in a QEMU aarch64 guest driving FunctionFS endpoints
> via AIO. Before the fix, running `usbip attach` from the host would
> cause the guest to oops with the following backtrace:
>
> Call trace:
> vep_dequeue+0x1c/0xe4 (P)
> usb_ep_dequeue+0x14/0x20
> ffs_aio_cancel+0x24/0x34
> __arm64_sys_io_cancel+0xb0/0x124
> do_el0_svc+0x68/0x100
> el0_svc+0x18/0x5c
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x98/0xdc
> el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158
>
> Assisted-by: opencode:openai/gpt-5.5
> Fixes: b6a0ca111867 ("usbip: vudc: Add UDC specific ops")
> Signed-off-by: Sam Day <me@samcday.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Reworked to remove vrequest->udc entirely and a call to ep_to_vudc()
> from vep_deqe
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260619-usbip-vudc-deque-fix-v1-1-9021463b1903@samcday.com
> ---
> drivers/usb/usbip/vudc.h | 1 -
> drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc.h b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc.h
> index faf61c9c6a98..5ef0e7d9b23a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ struct vep {
>
> struct vrequest {
> struct usb_request req;
> - struct vudc *udc;
> struct list_head req_entry; /* Request queue */
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> index c5f079c5a1ea..f0a1a44c18e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_dev.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int vep_dequeue(struct usb_ep *_ep, struct usb_request *_req)
>
> ep = to_vep(_ep);
> req = to_vrequest(_req);
> - udc = req->udc;
> + udc = ep_to_vudc(ep);
Why is "req" still needed now? Shouldn't that variable be removed also?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260620001816eucas1p216d49bf6a91cb50717b1bb9e1420d0d6@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-06-20 0:18 ` [PATCH v2] usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() Sam Day via B4 Relay
2026-06-22 7:36 ` Igor Kotrasinski/Security (PLT) /SRPOL/Engineer/Samsung Electronics
2026-06-25 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026062518-treason-styling-5185@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i.kotrasinsk@samsung.com \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=karo9@interia.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@samcday.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox