Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@mailbox.org>
Cc: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 7.1 regression bisected to "usb: core: Fix SuperSpeed root hub wMaxPacketSize"
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:22:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070255-rerun-unstable-a90a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80bdd3da-33c0-44b4-a1af-6aca44c1acd6@mailbox.org>

On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 02:20:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 7/2/26 10:51, Michal Pecio wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 00:09:42 +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> >> On 7/1/26 19:02, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The ethernet port of a Lenovo ThinkPad USB-C Dock Gen2 connected to
> >>> a ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 AMD stopped working in 7.1.
> >>>
> >>>   ip addr show enx482ae347e7c3
> >>>
> >>> says the interface doesn't exist. The only thing about it in dmesg
> >>> is:
> >>>
> >>>   r8152 8-1.1:1.0 enx482ae347e7c3: renamed from eth0
> >>>
> >>> In previous kernels, dmesg had more lines about it:
> >>>
> >>>   r8152 8-1.1:1.0 enx482ae347e7c3: renamed from eth0
> >>>   r8152 8-1.1:1.0 enx482ae347e7c3: carrier on
> >>>   r8152 8-1.1:1.0 enx482ae347e7c3: carrier off
> >>>   r8152 8-1.1:1.0 enx482ae347e7c3: carrier on
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I bisected this to d1e280334b7f ("usb: core: Fix SuperSpeed root
> >>> hub wMaxPacketSize"). Reverting that commit on top of 7.1.2 fixes
> >>> the issue.
> > 
> > Incredibly bizarre, I wonder if it's some userspace madness.
> 
> That reminded me that I'm using (an older upstream version of) usbguard. Unfortunately its GUI notifications when it blocks a USB device aren't working reliably currently.
> 
> Manually firing up its settings app revealed that it was indeed blocking the USB3 hub. Overriding it to be allowed fixed the issue with the bisected commit.
> 
> Looks like a false alert after all, sorry for the noise, and thanks for the help.

Thanks for letting us know, and this isn't the first time that usbguard
has caused a problem recently.  Did we change something that broke it's
functionality?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 16:02 7.1 regression bisected to "usb: core: Fix SuperSpeed root hub wMaxPacketSize" Michel Dänzer
2026-07-01 21:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-07-02  8:51   ` Michal Pecio
2026-07-02 12:20     ` Michel Dänzer
2026-07-02 12:22       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-07-02 12:25         ` Michel Dänzer
2026-07-02 12:38           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-02 16:34             ` Michel Dänzer
2026-07-05  8:59         ` Michal Pecio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026070255-rerun-unstable-a90a@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=michel.daenzer@mailbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox