From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "HE WEI (ギカク)" <skyexpoc@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: misc: usbio: reject endpoints smaller than the packet header
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 10:43:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026080209-satin-existing-5450@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726113511.57596-2-skyexpoc@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 08:35:07PM +0900, HE WEI (ギカク) wrote:
> usbio_ctrl_msg() and usbio_bulk_msg() bound the caller's transfer sizes
> against the endpoint packet size minus the fixed protocol header:
>
> if ((obuf_len > (usbio->txbuf_len - sizeof(*bpkt))) ||
> (ibuf_len > (usbio->txbuf_len - sizeof(*bpkt))))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> usbio->txbuf_len is a u16 and sizeof(*bpkt) is a size_t, so the
> subtraction is done in size_t. struct usbio_bulk_packet is 5 bytes and
> struct usbio_ctrl_packet is 4 bytes, so any endpoint smaller than that
> makes the expression wrap to a value close to ULONG_MAX, both
> comparisons become false and the check is disabled.
>
> txbuf_len and rxbuf_len come from the bulk endpoint wMaxPacketSize.
> usb_parse_endpoint() only clamps wMaxPacketSize downwards, it never
> enforces a lower bound:
>
> if (maxp > j) {
> dev_notice(ddev, "... has invalid maxpacket %d, setting to %d\n",
> ..., maxp, j);
> maxp = j;
> endpoint->desc.wMaxPacketSize = cpu_to_le16(i | maxp);
> }
>
> A wMaxPacketSize of 0 is merely logged with dev_notice(), and a bulk
> endpoint declaring 1 is accepted verbatim. usb_submit_urb() rejects
> maxpacket 0, but nothing rejects 1.
>
> A device claiming one of the ids in usbio_table[] and advertising a bulk
> out endpoint with wMaxPacketSize 1 therefore ends up with a one byte
> usbio->txbuf, and the very first I2C transfer reaches usbio_bulk_msg()
> via usbio_i2c_init() with obuf_len = 7. The wrapped check passes and the
> packet header stores overflow the slab object before memcpy() is even
> reached:
>
> bpkt = usbio->txbuf;
> bpkt->header.type = type; /* txbuf[0] */
> bpkt->header.cmd = cmd; /* txbuf[1], out of bounds */
> bpkt->header.flags = ...; /* txbuf[2], out of bounds */
> bpkt->len = cpu_to_le16(obuf_len); /* txbuf[3..4] */
> memcpy(bpkt->data, obuf, obuf_len); /* txbuf[5..] */
>
> Note that this is all complete before usb_bulk_msg() is called, so it
> does not depend on the host controller being willing to run a transfer
> on such an endpoint. With KASAN it is a slab-out-of-bounds write.
> Through usbio_i2c_write() obuf_len becomes sizeof(struct usbio_i2c_rw) +
> msg->len, so the length and the contents of the overflow are controlled
> by whoever can issue I2C transfers, up to the 4096 byte adapter limit.
>
> wMaxPacketSize 0 is worse in a different way: devm_kzalloc(dev, 0)
> returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR rather than NULL, so the existing
>
> if (!usbio->txbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> does not catch it and the same header stores dereference ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> usbio_bulk_recv() has the same problem on the receive side: it reads
> bpkt->header.flags at offset 2 of usbio->rxbuf before any length
> validation.
>
> The control side is different. For low, full and high speed hub.c
> forces ep0 wMaxPacketSize to 8, 16, 32 or 64, all larger than the
> control header, so usbio_ctrl_msg()'s check cannot wrap there. For
> SuperSpeed it accepts any bMaxPacketSize0 that encodes a non-zero value:
>
> i = maxp0;
> if (udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) {
> if (maxp0 <= 16)
> i = 1 << maxp0;
> else
> i = 0; /* Invalid */
> }
>
> combined with "(udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER && i > 0)" below, so
> bMaxPacketSize0 of 0 or 1 gives a ctrlbuf of 1 or 2 bytes and the same
> wrap, during the five usbio_ctrl_msg() calls in usbio_probe(). Whether
> a given host controller will operate such an ep0 has not been
> established; the control length is checked here regardless so that the
> invariant is stated once for all three buffers.
>
> Validate the three lengths in usbio_probe(), which is the only place
> that assigns them, instead of hardening each arithmetic site. A bridge
> whose endpoints cannot even carry the protocol header is unusable, so
> refusing to probe is the correct outcome. Rejecting the equal case as
> well is deliberate: it does not wrap, but it leaves no room for a
> payload, and excluding it makes every "<buf>_len - sizeof(*pkt)" in the
> driver a valid size of at least one.
>
> No supported bridge is affected. The low, full and high speed devices
> this driver binds to have an ep0 packet size of at least 8, and they use
> bulk endpoints of 64, or 63 via USBIO_QUIRK_BULK_MAXP_63.
>
> Found by code review, doing variant analysis on the code around
> 8c6314489550. The overflow was reproduced under AddressSanitizer with a
> userspace model of usbio_probe() and usbio_bulk_msg() that uses this
> driver's struct definitions, checks and stores verbatim; it has not been
> exercised on hardware or on dummy_hcd.
>
> Fixes: 121a0f839dbb ("usb: misc: Add Intel USBIO bridge driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5 asan
> Signed-off-by: HE WEI (ギカク) <skyexpoc@gmail.com>
> ---
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbio.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,24 @@
This is a very odd diff, what tool created it? Did "Claude" manually
write a diff? Please use the correct git diff output so that we can
correctly validate it is proper.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-26 11:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] usbio: fix two out-of-bounds accesses and a hang HE WEI (ギカク)
2026-07-26 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: misc: usbio: reject endpoints smaller than the packet header HE WEI (ギカク)
2026-07-26 11:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-29 21:16 ` Andi Shyti
2026-08-02 8:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-07-26 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c: usbio: reject bridges with undersized transfer buffers HE WEI (ギカク)
2026-07-26 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] usb: misc: usbio: bound the debug hex dumps by the received length HE WEI (ギカク)
2026-08-02 8:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-02 8:53 ` HE WEI(ギカク)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026080209-satin-existing-5450@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=skyexpoc@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox