From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518A2509EF9 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788862958; cv=none; b=QZbvNEuWhGHw8nciseEtjrQYoG6v1Oje2jGrghmqK4VlgH04ZGUZBisPNiepwMmXuSTyFEkg9zIKinHB9UU11d9DJCH0zkoRb5zDVsx4H0/BECPb5IGnx3EyCJcW6tisszie+XoROmQGb191m8l0IiPRH1KurlmEBOW1UeOzZHc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788862958; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JjqUPM+KddRXut/gO4vJpT3B2HmptKVO+hctHxJcdZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SNor6kFcuF96Lkel8MzalwC5YppdlwyxIoVo5mO7Mx5NMC3SjJBFjfJazAr/G63e/N0EfwYewtRTe7K2Lc6CSXFVnKNAnGw/O3JetxpkVNABx1JpY1dT2C73tfFV+H/nQHhwPkILzccFdx+Y5kVUdCMzpEPXHvl0fX3Za03FwF4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nNypJqRW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nNypJqRW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788862957; x=1820398957; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JjqUPM+KddRXut/gO4vJpT3B2HmptKVO+hctHxJcdZE=; b=nNypJqRWrHb2acxvCA6u6+P4JDNcjnbFEey5PhMizSsYIbKr6jhwOgi9 LXdJh2Jrsw/7GpKaZBteyYjuv2Pxj2ci8yH4U2KuGQjs/+QKaGHwB/hMJ voEPk8uY51GV+EhEtW447/61aRf0ZKCmmMArBtvGT8Ch6wHt5Ay2Ch0DK M140ahlwWbY1aihEqQZMl4/oabsihxmvWd3oOEYWs36XbnYWWzXMbH0dl HFzIBYHdFt+ik036GyLqWPJFIAlGa7e4JYt/sSDt2ssgABNUpG0UMnmcp QujkJAlxftlMrtXiOdT2X4lSxj1/BPgjau4IqzwvXpkGbziDrr5CbKnRW g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cE/1/BGISjiWqKkUKiRO0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fW9wQFuXRzmB/HNqHwnKGA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11899"; a="89278545" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,268,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="89278545" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Sep 2026 03:22:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LWj2Z6ZMSdCzSH5zbUTxRA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iCpYvRpeTGSLrP3qSJDaGw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,268,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="269628840" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2026 03:22:35 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1ED6899; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:22:33 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Atharva Tiwari Cc: YehezkelShB@gmail.com, alexander.fischer@kait2en.org, andre@negmaster.com, andreas.noever@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] thunderbolt: Add device links for Apple T2 Message-ID: <20260908102233.GG106095@black.igk.intel.com> References: <20260908080711.GZ106095@black.igk.intel.com> <20260908094938.1175-1-atharvatiwarilinuxdev@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260908094938.1175-1-atharvatiwarilinuxdev@gmail.com> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 05:49:38AM -0400, Atharva Tiwari wrote: > > Appled these to thunderbolt.git/next. I did not get any reports whether > > this still works on the Apple T2 system but I guess silence means "no > > issues" ;-) Let me know if that's not the case. > > Sorry for the silence, but yes the code is working perfectly fine. Okay thanks for letting me know!