From: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>, Raj Ojha <rajojha047@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+3ee5da0319ca17ef1f4e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: core: reclaim the request before freeing a timed-out card
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:12:28 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929161228.128616-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPx+jO9iva6YnKba8aEuOHURiZKjh2+wvhfC97bZ22UjGsXgNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 12:57 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Reviewing another patch [1] for the same issue, indicates the memstick
> host drivers are already managing the timeout themselves. So, even if
> your approach seems reasonable, I decided to go with the other
> solution for now.
Fine with me. Raj's patch fixes the UAF in my reproducer as well.
One concern: it is effectively a revert of b65e630a55a4 ("memstick: Add
timeout to prevent indefinite waiting"), which was the backstop for the
rtsx_usb_ms remove race that 99d7ab8db9d8 ("memstick: Fix deadlock by
moving removing flag earlier") only narrowed.
memstick_check() can still pass the host->removing check just before
rtsx_usb_ms_drv_remove() sets eject/removing. Its next request then
reaches rtsx_usb_ms_request(), which drops it because eject is set, so
nobody completes mrq_complete. With an unbounded wait, memstick_check()
never returns and memstick_remove_host() blocks in flush_workqueue()
forever. (cancel_work_sync() in drv_remove cancelling a queued
handle_req before it picks up the request looks like another way to
get there.)
I reproduced it in QEMU with dummy_hcd + raw-gadget emulating an
RTS5129, widening the window with a debug msleep() right after the
host->removing check and unplugging the device during it:
INFO: task kworker/u10:3:65 blocked for more than 20 seconds.
Workqueue: kmemstick memstick_check
__wait_for_common
memstick_check
INFO: task kworker/1:1:33 blocked for more than 20 seconds.
Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
__flush_workqueue
memstick_remove_host
rtsx_usb_ms_drv_remove
platform_remove
...
rtsx_usb_disconnect
usb_disconnect
hub_event
The same test on mainline (500 ms timeout) recovers fine.
Since memstick hosts are expected to always complete a request, I think
the right follow-up is in rtsx_usb_ms: complete requests with an error
after eject instead of dropping them. I can send that as a separate
rtsx_usb_ms patch on top of Raj's, if that works for you.
Thanks,
Thang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 10:04 [PATCH] memstick: core: reclaim the request before freeing a timed-out card Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-09-29 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-29 10:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-29 16:12 ` Nguyen Ngoc Thang [this message]
2026-09-30 9:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-30 14:07 ` [PATCH] memstick: rtsx_usb_ms: complete requests after eject instead of dropping them Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-09-30 16:03 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929161228.128616-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--to=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
--cc=rajojha047@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+3ee5da0319ca17ef1f4e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox