From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB3A22425B for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 05:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791265308; cv=none; b=fxibxtiBT6mRus9AQdzMZJeIKBl0kYherNeCrhyljh5TZAzZ6aKDGagFWgXEz3RJiDZ1M5ScdbhAuUWyhtrQryu/EhVDYgodNY9EvcxB+ORNkeonsKEx65nivUTdqtW2+OmQzoYv4zrnDoO8led2exg5Z39g9jkUbI6TUsOxGjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791265308; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EdJnnIUP5DR0UYTWrM/GJf+b8Z08YwDa5N6Bwcq4d1k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CxjwEcTcOxM9Fv4dn5iffdT4w2WaS06DuG16fmIeja3b/LezLIiAwjwpT5hOMa0upJVAU4C02iz5T5MBwzlUt+aXbMFM4e3cR/ph6tLbQPTE2eujd0zYfhvnLLCDk2AIuVDnPlndFjRAZ+iZlAd8rU5nceXKS0+fEefYftcrnS8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=hojCvMAN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="hojCvMAN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1801F1F000FF; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 05:41:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1791265306; bh=qeTow55ZtVSQZhgqmBPLp9ANymDlH+OFFye0kOzCTLg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hojCvMANgTmZWR8h76Qog4v0KiGiFoCFLE8TsEuRuVn7VmzPGVHv0vJBdXNWnYPKZ uNJRxDo23SuYGlYcPK1MbExm3Yu1qHCxpE3FrTD/2tnujEKMV2OABsq93UCnrYoOOz x57cykAVJu7PngH+qqL3vpz6zAdZQuKOYUIjDG3o= Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 07:41:43 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thinh Nguyen , Roman Gushchin Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Thoughts on Sashiko reviews for linux-usb Message-ID: <2026100602-overtly-scaling-3153@gregkh> References: <2026100647-stilt-mongrel-b368@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026100647-stilt-mongrel-b368@gregkh> On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 07:03:14AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 12:45:15AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to get your thoughts on having Sashiko send review results to > > linux-usb for patches posted to the list. > > > > I started looking into this after receiving a reference to a Sashiko > > review for a dwc3 patch that I wasn't Cc'd on, which required me to > > track down the review separately to understand the feedback. > > > > Sashiko is currently configured per mailing list, so any change would > > apply to all patches sent to linux-usb rather than a specific subsystem. > > > > Would anyone object to enabling Sashiko reviews on linux-usb? > > Not at all, want to submit the pull request to the repo to add it, or do > you need/want me to? Now done: https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/651 but I don't know if that adds a "will email back the review" workflow for patches sent to linux-usb@vger. Roman, it looks like the sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml file isn't in the repo anymore, or at least it's not in the git checkout that I can see. Does the linux-usb list need to be configured anywhere else as well? thanks, greg k-h