From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Paul Elder <paul.elder@pitt.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Subject: [2/4] usb: gadget: composite: add function to increment delayed_status
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:00:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2658992.BJfkddU6Jz@avalon> (raw)
Hi Alan,
On Friday, 20 April 2018 17:09:57 EEST Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > According to include/linux/usb/composite.h, the delayed_status field
> > should be protected by cdev->lock, which you should use here.
> >
> > I've read through the code and found out that, while all callers of
> > reset_config(), as well as usb_composite_setup_continue(), correctly take
> > the lock, it isn't taken around f->set_alt() in composite_setup(). This
> > causes the race condition. I wonder if a simpler fix wouldn't be to take
> > the lock before calling f->set_alt() and releasing it after incrementing
> > delayed_status. I am however worried that this could lead to deadlocks if
> > one of the existing set_alt() handlers calls a function that takes the
> > same lock. Another worry is that some of the .set_alt() handlers might
> > not expect to be called with interrupts disabled. This should be
> > analyzed, and I hope that Roger and/or Felipe will have some insight on
> > this.
>
> set_alt handlers generally have to disable and enable endpoints, which
> requires a process context. They cannot run with interrupts disabled.
Thank you for the information. Isn't the following code path problematic then
?
int
composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
{
...
case USB_REQ_SET_CONFIGURATION:
...
spin_lock(&cdev->lock);
value = set_config(cdev, ctrl, w_value);
spin_unlock(&cdev->lock);
...
}
static int set_config(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev,
const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl, unsigned number)
{
...
/* Initialize all interfaces by setting them to altsetting zero. */
for (tmp = 0; tmp < MAX_CONFIG_INTERFACES; tmp++) {
...
result = f->set_alt(f, tmp, 0);
...
}
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-21 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-21 11:00 Laurent Pinchart [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-21 15:38 [2/4] usb: gadget: composite: add function to increment delayed_status Alan Stern
2018-04-20 14:51 Roger Quadros
2018-04-20 14:09 Alan Stern
2018-04-19 19:42 Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-18 3:18 Paul Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2658992.BJfkddU6Jz@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.elder@pitt.edu \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).