public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] usb: xhci: tegra: Check padctrl interrupt presence in device tree
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:16:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44567c4f-0f0f-6995-b48f-c427cedb6755@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82a02e70-33bc-7faf-e085-a25884e48844@gmail.com>

21.10.2021 20:13, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 21.10.2021 18:20, Alan Stern пишет:
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 06:08:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 21.10.2021 17:57, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>> It might be wrong to disable device_may_wakeup() because it will change
>>>> the system suspend-resume behaviour, i.e. you won't be able to resume by
>>>> USB event, see [1].
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc6/source/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c#L1962
>>>>
>>>> Although, I'm not sure whether this is a correct behaviour to start
>>>> with. Previously, before the offending commit, device_wakeup was never
>>>> enabled for tegra-xusb. Commit message doesn't explain why wakeup is now
>>>> enabled unconditionally, wakeup checks aren't needed at all then. This
>>>> makes no sense, please check it with JC Kuo.
>>>
>>> Although, wakeup could be disabled via sysfs, so it makes sense. Still
>>> it's not clear whether it's a correct behaviour to enable wakeup during
>>> system suspend by default. If it wakes machine from suspend when USB
>>> device is plugged/unplugged, then it's a wrong behaviour.
>>
>> It depends on the details of how the device works.  In most cases we do 
>> want to enable wakeup by default for host controller devices.  The 
>> reason is simple enough: If some USB device attached to the HC is 
>> enabled for wakeup and sends a wakeup request, we don't want the request 
>> to get lost because the HC isn't allowed to forward the request on to 
>> the CPU.
>>
>> But we do not want to enable wakeup for root hubs.  In particular, we 
>> don't want to wake up a suspended system merely because a USB device has 
>> been plugged or unplugged.
>>
>> Clearly this arrangement depends on the hardware making a distinction 
>> between wakeup requests originating from the root hub and those simply 
>> passing through the HC.
> 
> Should USB keyboard be able to wake up every HC or it's a
> machine-specific feature?

I mean whether key press should wake up HC if wake-up is enabled for the
keyboard device.

> I'm asking because wakeup works on a typical
> Intel hardware, but doesn't work on older Tegra SoCs that use Chipidea
> controller. It's not obvious to me whether this is something that
> firmware handles for Intel or it's broken on Tegra. Could you please
> clarify? If it should work for every HC, then I may try to take a closer
> look.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 11:55 [PATCH v1] usb: xhci: tegra: Check padctrl interrupt presence in device tree Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 14:01 ` Thierry Reding
2021-10-21 14:57   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 15:08     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 15:20       ` Alan Stern
2021-10-21 17:13         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 17:16           ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2021-10-21 19:14             ` Alan Stern
2021-10-21 19:17               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-26  7:23     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 21:37 ` Michał Mirosław
2021-10-21 21:46   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-21 22:14     ` Michał Mirosław
2021-10-22  5:58       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-22  9:29         ` Michał Mirosław
2021-10-22  9:35           ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44567c4f-0f0f-6995-b48f-c427cedb6755@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jckuo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kwizart@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox