From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net (008.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D3A129E64; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718228494; cv=none; b=TCsFylzJoDIZjuqg/FVC9RgOmDbnquqo+nL77bDW2H1GVgewsXstjmCaB8+Kcr2wqkQWI/ySCjIPD/42b1Qh1BjCvbZe8B7+UtlMJ6kmtX7Ghmfg/7qQy5cpZpvSJKlV/14dfxMO9eJ5SuBh7G24GT/k+nMfUZ7e+JC4oXBMl1U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718228494; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7x2FDvxcUC0zqmhJl7l18I4RbjqoDccV+BJoZyJQjCs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=iulaPd1PgXlVHoLW05XCAIYgWSZeFWU8Pn8N4FYMigOkyx6yShmE4JNve3VViE4s7DSP5pX10+9zBZC64qSq51rYAooif7LSEfhsXsAGPcG6OlafAMfCEkW0HE4MV26EsS8jbDpsXIWN6Oc8tYAdn8Oq4xZfB9j2bKUeUs0vq5U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=rqB2Doyn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="rqB2Doyn" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VzzWc1r0qz6Cnk9Y; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:41:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1718228489; x=1720820490; bh=7x2FDvxcUC0zqmhJl7l18I4R bjqoDccV+BJoZyJQjCs=; b=rqB2Doyn0hywRAw/D3QbDlO7LAopyoiRAh4wa9iQ v2835DL8uaxGe2EOqRU91P3dJvxqZQfA1bgtEGeFQbKM/1lCOirv8JxKqwg3Kvsl 0puzKOgsaQuLa86qP3+LUcA7m+PwyPtRR/SqnKMF6yoFqLDML20SMpcCD/dlrEH/ F6diFvl77EMCW4F5AXPkSvpHIFmmp/DeI/l2+Oqw88us3AVk6fw/2UicbEK+m23N NqGrpAJcksrRqBH0Ud/WsbJgvaLrM9JbdKi1dWWQlH/6i+unLutS399KWa6/yDw7 azF79WZs3vV3rxGJ5DF6VE7KOIH55ZBB5rSkVkDqf5OL8A== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (008.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 7DCoJq-qybHo; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.96.154.26] (unknown [104.132.0.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VzzWX63qJz6Cnk9X; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48a000f5-ef66-43bc-b501-3ea7bca07c0c@acm.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:41:28 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: core: Fix an incorrect comment To: "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: Alan Stern , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" References: <20240612203735.4108690-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240612203735.4108690-2-bvanassche@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20240612203735.4108690-2-bvanassche@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/12/24 1:37 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > The comment that scsi_static_device_list would go away was added more > than 18 years ago. Today, that list is still there and a large number > of additional entries have been added. This shows that this comment is > incorrect. Hence fix that comment. Please ignore this patch - this patch was already posted earlier today. Thanks, Bart.