From: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:38:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48e7b906-d7e3-46e3-e2bc-71512a1e64aa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0545783-0a8f-3cb7-2cae-ced85c91e51d@gmail.com>
Hi
Op 10-11-2022 om 13:45 schreef Ferry Toth:
> (sorry sent html with previous attempt)
>
> On 10-11-2022 01:06, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Ferry,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022, Ferry Toth wrote:
>>> Since commit 0f010171
>>> Dual Role support on Intel Merrifield platform broke due to rearranging
>>> the call to dwc3_get_extcon().
>>>
>>> It appears to be caused by ulpi_read_id() on the first test write
>>> failing
>>> with -ETIMEDOUT. Currently ulpi_read_id() expects to discover the phy
>>> via
>>> DT when the test write fails and returns 0 in that case even if DT
>>> does not
>>> provide the phy. Due to the timeout being masked dwc3 probe continues by
>>> calling dwc3_core_soft_reset() followed by dwc3_get_extcon() which
>>> happens
>>> to return -EPROBE_DEFER. On deferred probe ulpi_read_id() finally
>>> succeeds.
>>>
>>> This patch changes ulpi_read_id() to return -ETIMEDOUT when it occurs
>>> and
>>> catches the error in dwc3_core_init(). It handles the error by calling
>>> dwc3_core_soft_reset() after which it requests -EPROBE_DEFER. On
>>> deferred
>>> probe ulpi_read_id() again succeeds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ferry Toth<ftoth@exalondelft.nl>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 5 +++--
>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Can you split the dwc3 change and ulpi change to separate patches?
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> I will send v2
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
>>> index d7c8461976ce..d8f22bc2f9d0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
>>> @@ -206,8 +206,9 @@ static int ulpi_read_id(struct ulpi *ulpi)
>>> /* Test the interface */
>>> ret = ulpi_write(ulpi, ULPI_SCRATCH, 0xaa);
>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>> - goto err;
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> ret = ulpi_read(ulpi, ULPI_SCRATCH);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> index 648f1c570021..e293ef70039b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> @@ -1106,8 +1106,11 @@ static int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>> if (!dwc->ulpi_ready) {
>>> ret = dwc3_core_ulpi_init(dwc);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dwc3_core_soft_reset(dwc);
>> We shouldn't need to do soft reset here. The controller shouldn't be at
>> a bad/incorrect state at this point to warrant a soft-reset. There will
>> be a soft-reset when it goes through the initialization again.
>
> It doesn't go through the initialization again unless we set
> -EPROBE_DEFER. And when we make ulpi_read_id() return -EPROBE_DEFER it
> will goto err0 here, so skips dwc3_core_soft_reset.
>
> Do you mean you prefer something like:
>
> if (ret) {
>
> if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> else goto err0;
>
> }
I just tested, and calling dwc3_core_soft_reset() proves to be necessary
as we need to goto err0 directly after. Else ret is overwritten and
-EPROBE_DEFER lost.
>>> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> We shouldn't automatically set every error status to correspond to
>> -EPROBE_DEFER. Check only the approapriate error codes (-ETIMEDOUT +
>> any other?).
> Other could be -ENOMEM. I think no need to do any new handling for that.
>>> goto err0;
>>> + }
>>> dwc->ulpi_ready = true;
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 22:17 [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout Ferry Toth
2022-11-10 0:06 ` Thinh Nguyen
2022-11-10 12:45 ` Ferry Toth
2022-11-10 20:38 ` Ferry Toth [this message]
2022-11-11 1:31 ` Thinh Nguyen
2022-11-18 22:29 ` Ferry Toth
2022-11-18 23:55 ` Thinh Nguyen
2022-11-10 13:06 ` Heikki Krogerus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48e7b906-d7e3-46e3-e2bc-71512a1e64aa@gmail.com \
--to=fntoth@gmail.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox