From: Prashanth K <prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kees Bakker <kees@ijzerbout.nl>,
William McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: gadget: Use get_status callback to set remote wakeup capability
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:36:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d68cb04-377f-4ebf-99c7-c63b68aebf60@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408011758.qfdflgrrmahwmfqi@synopsys.com>
On 08-04-25 06:48 am, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025, Prashanth K wrote:
>> Currently when the host sends GET_STATUS request for an interface,
>> we use get_status callbacks to set/clear remote wakeup capability
>> of that interface. And if get_status callback isn't present for
>> that interface, then we assume its remote wakeup capability based
>> on bmAttributes.
>>
>> Now consider a scenario, where we have a USB configuration with
>> multiple interfaces (say ECM + ADB), here ECM is remote wakeup
>> capable and as of now ADB isn't. And bmAttributes will indicate
>> the device as wakeup capable. With the current implementation,
>> when host sends GET_STATUS request for both interfaces, we will
>> set FUNC_RW_CAP for both. This results in USB3 CV Chapter 9.15
>> (Function Remote Wakeup Test) failures as host expects remote
>> wakeup from both interfaces.
>>
>> The above scenario is just an example, and the failure can be
>> observed if we use configuration with any interface except ECM.
>> Hence avoid configuring remote wakeup capability from composite
>> driver based on bmAttributes, instead use get_status callbacks
>> and let the function drivers decide this.
>>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>> Fixes: 481c225c4802 ("usb: gadget: Handle function suspend feature selector")
>> Signed-off-by: Prashanth K <prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
>> index 869ad99afb48..5c6da360e95b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
>> @@ -2010,16 +2010,12 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
>> break;
>>
>> if (f->get_status) {
>> - status = f->get_status(f);
>> + /* if D5 is not set, then device is not wakeup capable */
>> + if (f->config->bmAttributes & USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP)
>
> We should allow function to execute get_status regardless of
> USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP. There are other status beside wakeup.
>
Agree with the first part, I also wanted to remove the explicit check
for USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP. But anyways kept it since only 2 bits (RW_CAP
and RW) are defined in the spec as the status of GetStatus for an Interface.
Lets do one thing, I'll rearrange it as follows
if (f->get_status) {
status = f->get_status(f);
/* if D5 is not set, then device is not wakeup capable */
if (f->config->bmAttributes & USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP)
status &= ~(USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP | USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW);
>> + status = f->get_status(f);
>> +
>> if (status < 0)
>> break;
>> - } else {
>> - /* Set D0 and D1 bits based on func wakeup capability */
>> - if (f->config->bmAttributes & USB_CONFIG_ATT_WAKEUP) {
>> - status |= USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP;
>
>
> So right now we're not able to configure the function to enable RW
> capable? Perhaps we need to update the composite configfs for this?
>
The removed code used to set USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP even for
interfaces which doesn't have RW capability. Its better to handle this
from function level than from composite.
Regards,
Prashanth K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 11:08 [PATCH v1 0/3] Fixes for USB3 CV Chapter 9.15 tests Prashanth K
2025-04-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add get_status callback Prashanth K
2025-04-08 1:08 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-08 5:05 ` Prashanth K
2025-04-09 0:56 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: gadget: Use get_status callback to set remote wakeup capability Prashanth K
2025-04-08 1:18 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-08 5:06 ` Prashanth K [this message]
2025-04-09 0:55 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-09 4:22 ` Prashanth K
2025-04-09 22:05 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-09 22:12 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-10 6:08 ` Prashanth K
2025-04-11 1:00 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-03 11:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] usb: dwc3: gadget: Make gadget_wakeup asynchronous Prashanth K
2025-04-07 23:38 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-08 5:34 ` Prashanth K
2025-04-09 0:43 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-09 4:15 ` Prashanth K
2025-04-09 21:51 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-10 5:48 ` Prashanth K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d68cb04-377f-4ebf-99c7-c63b68aebf60@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kees@ijzerbout.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox