From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-10628.protonmail.ch (mail-10628.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0693750CF; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785429545; cv=none; b=AgiPv5olH3Mn6LLoRgHgflIpyk1uoD61MfESQzSLEYNifqGtZrTRaV1KuobF3qtQTtWB3GfPwhuk6vRIiZMdoeblevyvJX3R2zDtouEKv67dDTfTeZHgKoAubJeH7N7tpAdyn1yiFfijR1zQbd49sDI3odVYRxZbhF9JrszO7mM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785429545; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FvSRXzH21BOJOktta5GQtFHb1pGMF2T86f5HtQBYDl8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fYGFsaSFwWP9c/B9pBlLlON6hHtJBC70rJk8FvJ9LvbcVn70vausEpGwdZdptRjXxSUuLxpI6AxccFd3X6IjB0kMB6Qkrpa/2bNDKoNKLs+4TE1RIu165AiIEZzyI/qf/3AJzEhEfd+W82DJ7/bLYa+cp9XTrnL4GUja8i/35p0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=fE+70jUT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="fE+70jUT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1785429539; x=1785688739; bh=FvSRXzH21BOJOktta5GQtFHb1pGMF2T86f5HtQBYDl8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=fE+70jUTpsYhVkVyacxBQcq4J+DvncCG9+8vI1lR0rnR1IV1GD2WZ6IGbBO6BFRYW 2K/ozJ9KhdTcKiroK+xft8F+3Xu+GDqFmduzZqvzTfNVUxC2pZKiq0gqMQqch8W0Ky O/nXCvfOflqLGaxiuov5GASHo+LLsjXhpnjCf4WEX3xYzqfGgA8bvu65f03CSF7cyo OaAvRuS8WDfWDjooblZvVQnoa2d1L2gKkl/rcJh5QLr4hkA9xAjtMXC/Vq8soCGTLW dm9+xVt6tu34geUSneF9Ll2y60fjXBFr0mzLw3FhuF/FBdkdz6bDKh7KNTuOq94ozD xz1/5dNsoBXiA== Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:38:52 +0000 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski From: Esteban Urrutia Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475 Message-ID: <4dcdfd25-edec-4ea9-8b80-2472e2b66e5e@proton.me> In-Reply-To: <20260730-resourceful-scrupulous-goshawk-c9ea53@quoll> References: <20260729-sm8475-pmic-glink-v1-0-c2e1967c04de@proton.me> <20260729-sm8475-pmic-glink-v1-1-c2e1967c04de@proton.me> <20260730-resourceful-scrupulous-goshawk-c9ea53@quoll> Feedback-ID: 147889766:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 18bca195c0b4ada2204842aecab4aed0bf173d9a Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/30/26 5:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > First, not true. You did not add compatible for pmic-glink. >=20 > Second, that's redundant. You just repeated subject and the diff > (although incorrectly). Explain why this is not compatible with existing > variants, writing bindings EXPLICITLY ask for that. Thanks for the heads up. Will fix it. Regards, Esteban