From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Faisal Hassan <quic_faisalh@quicinc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xhci: Fix Link TRB DMA in command ring stopped completion event
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 18:39:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51a0598a-2618-4501-af40-f1e9a1463bca@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241021131904.20678-1-quic_faisalh@quicinc.com>
On 21.10.2024 16.19, Faisal Hassan wrote:
> During the aborting of a command, the software receives a command
> completion event for the command ring stopped, with the TRB pointing
> to the next TRB after the aborted command.
>
> If the command we abort is located just before the Link TRB in the
> command ring, then during the 'command ring stopped' completion event,
> the xHC gives the Link TRB in the event's cmd DMA, which causes a
> mismatch in handling command completion event.
>
> To handle this situation, an additional check has been added to ignore
> the mismatch error and continue the operation.
>
> Fixes: 7f84eef0dafb ("USB: xhci: No-op command queueing and irq handler.")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Faisal Hassan <quic_faisalh@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed traversing of TRBs with in_range() API.
> - Simplified the if condition check.
>
> v1 link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241018195953.12315-1-quic_faisalh@quicinc.com
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index b2950c35c740..de375c9f08ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,29 @@ static void inc_td_cnt(struct urb *urb)
> urb_priv->num_tds_done++;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return true if the DMA is pointing to a Link TRB in the ring;
> + * otherwise, return false.
> + */
> +static bool is_dma_link_trb(struct xhci_ring *ring, dma_addr_t dma)
> +{
> + struct xhci_segment *seg;
> + union xhci_trb *trb;
> +
> + seg = ring->first_seg;
> + do {
> + if (in_range(dma, seg->dma, TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE)) {
> + /* found the TRB, check if it's link */
> + trb = &seg->trbs[(dma - seg->dma) / sizeof(*trb)];
> + return trb_is_link(trb);
> + }
> +
> + seg = seg->next;
> + } while (seg != ring->first_seg);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void trb_to_noop(union xhci_trb *trb, u32 noop_type)
> {
> if (trb_is_link(trb)) {
> @@ -1718,6 +1741,7 @@ static void handle_cmd_completion(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>
> trace_xhci_handle_command(xhci->cmd_ring, &cmd_trb->generic);
>
> + cmd_comp_code = GET_COMP_CODE(le32_to_cpu(event->status));
> cmd_dequeue_dma = xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(xhci->cmd_ring->deq_seg,
> cmd_trb);
> /*
> @@ -1725,17 +1749,26 @@ static void handle_cmd_completion(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> * command.
> */
> if (!cmd_dequeue_dma || cmd_dma != (u64)cmd_dequeue_dma) {
> - xhci_warn(xhci,
> - "ERROR mismatched command completion event\n");
> - return;
> + /*
> + * For the 'command ring stopped' completion event, there
> + * is a risk of a mismatch in dequeue pointers if we abort
> + * the command just before the link TRB in the command ring.
> + * In this scenario, the cmd_dma in the event would point
> + * to a link TRB, while the software dequeue pointer circles
> + * back to the start.
> + */
> + if (!(cmd_comp_code == COMP_COMMAND_RING_STOPPED &&
> + is_dma_link_trb(xhci->cmd_ring, cmd_dma))) {
Do we in this COMP_COMMAND_RING_STOPPED case even need to check if
cmd_dma != (u64)cmd_dequeue_dma, or if command ring stopped on a link TRB?
Could we just move the COMP_COMMAND_RING_STOPPED handling a bit earlier?
if (cmd_comp_code == COMP_COMMAND_RING_STOPPED) {
complete_all(&xhci->cmd_ring_stop_completion);
return;
}
If I remember correctly it should just turn aborted command TRBs into no-ops,
and restart the command ring
Thanks
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 13:19 [PATCH v2] xhci: Fix Link TRB DMA in command ring stopped completion event Faisal Hassan
2024-10-21 15:39 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2024-10-22 12:34 ` Faisal Hassan
2024-10-22 14:33 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-10-22 15:27 ` Faisal Hassan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51a0598a-2618-4501-af40-f1e9a1463bca@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=quic_faisalh@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox