From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io: Enable xHCI host
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 13:49:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71e96b4e-a0b4-4145-8174-a18cf1ccd06e@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10383aa9-942b-415d-b70e-ade3a7aae6fa@gmx.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4896 bytes --]
On 11/27/23 11:22, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 27.11.23 um 19:41 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>> On 11/27/23 09:44, Justin Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/27/23 8:28 AM, Phil Elwell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 12:39, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Phil,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Justin,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [add Phil]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 27.11.23 um 07:02 schrieb Justin Chen:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/25/23 6:56 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In contrast to the Raspberry Pi 4, the Compute Module 4 or
>>>>>>>>>>> the IO board
>>>>>>>>>>> does not have a VL805 USB 3.0 host controller, which is
>>>>>>>>>>> connected via
>>>>>>>>>>> PCIe. Instead, the BCM2711 on the Compute Module provides the
>>>>>>>>>>> built-in
>>>>>>>>>>> xHCI.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does this work? I maintain this built-in xHCI controller
>>>>>>>>>> internally. I
>>>>>>>>>> wasn't aware the Compute Module uses this block.
>>>>>>>>> i successful tested this with a CM4 (arm 32 bit,
>>>>>>>>> multi_v7_lpae_defconfig) with eMMC. Before this series the USB
>>>>>>>>> devices
>>>>>>>>> (mouse, keyboard) connected to the host interface didn't work.
>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>> comparing vendor DTS with mainline i noticed the missing xHCI
>>>>>>>>> block [1].
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately i wasn't able to get further information from the
>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>> datasheets. I don't know if the VideoCore does some magic
>>>>>>>>> tricks on the
>>>>>>>>> xHCI or i missed some downstream xHCI changes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This block is held in reset and needs a bit toggled to get things
>>>>>>>>>> going. Florian, just to confirm, this is our
>>>>>>>>>> "brcm,xhci-brcm-v2" block
>>>>>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>> [1] -
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-6.1.y/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-ds.dtsi#L119
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's the question here? Does the XHCI block present in the
>>>>>>>> raspberrypi/linux dtsi file really exist? Yes it does.
>>>>>>> since i don't have any documentation about the xHCI block, i
>>>>>>> assumed the
>>>>>>> compatible generic-xhci is correct. But Justin seems to suggest
>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>> xHCI block needs some special treatment and we need a specific
>>>>>>> compatible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did i missed some xHCI driver changes?
>>>>>>> Does the VC firmware something to the xHCI especially on CM4?
>>>>>> The firmware switches the on-board USB pins from DWC-OTG to XHCI if
>>>>>> otg_mode=1 is set in config.txt, or if booting over USB MSD.
>>>>> is this pinctrl/pinmux available from ARM via 0x7e200000 or a
>>>>> different
>>>>> IO address?
>>>>
>>>> It's in a different, undocumented block.
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>
>>> Well if it works, then maybe I am misunderstanding something here.
>>> Maybe its time for me to pick up a CM4 board.
>> There is one on my desk that you are welcome to use, or remote into if
>> you prefer.
>>
>> To answer your earlier question, yes this is the same block as the one
>> present in 72112 for which we use the "brcm,xhci-brcm-v2" compatible
>> string, it would be preferable to have it backed by that compatible
>> string in case we happen to support suspend/resume on the Pi 4B one
>> day, if nothing else.
>>
>> I did confirm that after applying Stefan's patches plus changing my
>> config.txt to have otg_mode=1, USB continues to be fully functional.
>> This is the case with using both "generic-xhci" or "brcm,xhci-brcm-v2"
>> so with the minor request to update the compatible to
>> "brcm,xhci-brcm-v2", this is:
>>
>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
>>
>> Stefan, I am getting a deadlock on boot if I leave your changes in and
>> uncomment dwc_otg=1 in config.txt, is there an alias or something that
>> the boot loader should be patching?
>
> sorry but i'm unable reproduce those deadlocks, neither in arm or arm64,
> with eMMC or without eMMC, xhci builtin or module. If i uncomment this
> in config.txt, USB host is just disabled.
Here is my config.txt FWIW:
# A bit too verbose
uart_2ndstage=1
enable_uart=1
arm_64bit=1
# Custom kernel images
kernel=kernel8-upstream.img
#kernel=kernel7l.img
#device_tree=bcm2711-rpi-4-b-UPSTREAM.dtb
device_tree=bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io-UPSTREAM.dtb
force_turbo=1
# DWC-OTG <=> XHCI
#otg_mode=1
>
> I'm using the following firmware:
>
> raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Attached to firmware from
> 2023-03-17T10:50:39
OK, my CM4 is at 2022-07-25T15:10:17, updating to 2023-10-17T15:39:16
does not really show any difference.
>
> Is this DTS difference a problem?
It does not appear so, changing the node unit-name does not affect the
results.
>
> upstream -> xhci: usb@7e9c0000
> downstream -> xhci: xhci@7e9c0000
Side question: does the VPU boot ROM or firmware take care of
configuring the USB PHY somehow? Should not we also have a Device Tree
node for it eventually?
--
Florian
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4221 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-27 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-26 2:56 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io: Enable xHCI host Stefan Wahren
2023-11-26 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: xhci: Add optional power-domains Stefan Wahren
2023-11-26 11:14 ` Conor Dooley
2023-11-26 2:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: bcm2711: Add generic xHCI Stefan Wahren
2023-11-26 2:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io: Enable xHCI host Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 0:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Cyril Brulebois
2023-11-27 10:57 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 11:55 ` Cyril Brulebois
2023-11-27 12:38 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 13:02 ` Cyril Brulebois
2023-11-27 15:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 15:59 ` Cyril Brulebois
2023-11-27 16:56 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 18:21 ` Cyril Brulebois
2023-11-27 18:52 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 6:02 ` Justin Chen
2023-11-27 11:08 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 11:22 ` Phil Elwell
2023-11-27 11:38 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 11:58 ` Phil Elwell
2023-11-27 12:33 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 16:28 ` Phil Elwell
2023-11-27 17:44 ` Justin Chen
2023-11-27 18:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-11-27 19:22 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-27 21:49 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2023-11-28 6:44 ` Stefan Wahren
2023-11-28 14:46 ` Phil Elwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71e96b4e-a0b4-4145-8174-a18cf1ccd06e@broadcom.com \
--to=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
--cc=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox