From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Avoid doing warm reset on disconnect event
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:19:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <745bd358-c34c-9deb-42e6-6f6a54fd3e2e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211126115652.1134230-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
On 26.11.2021 13.56, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> Unplugging USB device may cause an incorrect warm reset loop:
> [ 143.039019] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Port change event, 2-3, id 19, portsc: 0x4202c0
> [ 143.039025] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: handle_port_status: starting usb2 port polling.
> [ 143.039051] hub 2-0:1.0: state 7 ports 10 chg 0000 evt 0008
> [ 143.039058] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-3 read: 0x4202c0, return 0x4102c0
> [ 143.039092] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: clear port3 connect change, portsc: 0x4002c0
> [ 143.039096] usb usb2-port3: link state change
> [ 143.039099] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: clear port3 link state change, portsc: 0x2c0
> [ 143.039101] usb usb2-port3: do warm reset
> [ 143.096736] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-3 read: 0x2b0, return 0x2b0
> [ 143.096751] usb usb2-port3: not warm reset yet, waiting 50ms
> [ 143.131500] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Can't queue urb, port error, link inactive
> [ 143.138260] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Port change event, 2-3, id 19, portsc: 0x2802a0
> [ 143.138263] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: handle_port_status: starting usb2 port polling.
> [ 143.160756] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-3 read: 0x2802a0, return 0x3002a0
> [ 143.160798] usb usb2-port3: not warm reset yet, waiting 200ms
>
> The warm reset is due to its PLS is in eSS.Inactive state. However, USB
> 3.2 spec table 10-13 mentions "Ports can be disabled by either a fault
> condition (disconnect event or other fault condition)", xHCI 1.2 spec
> table 5-27 also states that "This flag shall automatically be cleared to
> ‘0’ by a disconnect event or other fault condition." on PED.
>
> So use CSC = 0 and PED = 0 as indication that device is disconnecting to
> avoid doing warm reset.
My understanding is that PED = 0 in case of disconnect, error (PLS=Inactive), or
during active reset signalling. See xHCI Figure 4-27: USB3 Root Hub Port State Machine.
signal states (0,0,0,0) are PP,CCS,PED,PR.
I'm looking at a similar case where Inactive link is reported at disconnect for a while
before missing terminations are detected and link finally goes to RxDetect.
If the port was reset immediately when Inactive link state was reported the port stays stuck
in port reset.
This might have been related to the address0 locking issues recently fixed.
Anyway, to avoid the extra reset of a removed USB3 device I started polling the link state of
the Inactive link for some time before resetting it. This gives the link time to detect
missing terminations and go to RxDetect, and driver can skip the reset.
Planning on upstreaming it, patch is here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mnyman/xhci.git/commit/?h=fix_avoid_disconnect_reset&id=72d20c026b7812d096c6b5184a3888894401c829
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-26 11:56 [PATCH v2] usb: core: Avoid doing warm reset on disconnect event Kai-Heng Feng
2021-11-26 15:30 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-21 3:35 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-12-21 14:30 ` Alan Stern
2021-11-29 10:19 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2021-11-30 2:36 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-12-02 3:10 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-12-03 14:17 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-12-06 2:52 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-12-21 3:35 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-12-22 15:11 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=745bd358-c34c-9deb-42e6-6f6a54fd3e2e@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox