From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
Yo-Jung Leo Lin <Leo.Lin@amd.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "S,
Sanath" <sanath.s@amd.com>,
"Natikar, Basavaraj" <basavaraj.natikar@amd.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: Quiesce AMD NHI during suspend
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:28:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <780d621d-248c-4a6e-9f00-37bf60bd916c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alcW0iPBPF9tp5cv@acelan-Precision-5480>
On 7/15/26 12:19 AM, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 01:37:55PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Some comments about your changes too.
>>
>> On 7/8/26 10:34, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> ++ linux-pci
>>> ++ Sanath && Basavaraj
>>>
>>> On 7/5/26 21:34, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
>>>> On some AMD USB4 systems, resuming from system suspend with a
>>>> Thunderbolt dock in the picture hard-hangs the machine very early in the
>>>> resume path, before the Thunderbolt driver gets a chance to rescan and
>>>> re-establish the topology. It is a PCIe bus wedge: the system never
>>>> reaches the point where the thunderbolt module could recover the dock,
>>>> and the kernel journal does not persist past "PM: suspend entry
>>>> (s2idle)".
>>>>
>>>> Reproduce:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Affected platform: an AMD USB4 host with the thunderbolt driver
>>>> bound to its NHI PCI functions. Observed on a Dell Pro 14 Plus
>>>> (PB14255, AMD Phoenix) which exposes two USB4 NHI functions
>>>> (0000:c6:00.5 and 0000:c6:00.6).
>>>>
>>>> 2. Put the system into s2idle (Low Power S0 Idle / Modern Standby)
>>>> with no dock attached.
>>>>
>>>> 3. While the system is suspended, plug in a Dell SD25TB4 Thunderbolt 4
>>>> dock (Goshen Ridge). The plug event wakes the system, and the
>>>> dock's
>>>> downstream PCIe bridges are enumerated behind the AMD USB4 PCIe
>>>> tunnel during the resume.
>>>>
>>>> 4. The machine hard-hangs during the noirq resume phase, before the
>>>> thunderbolt driver re-establishes the topology. The Dell power
>>>> indicator flashes the "3A5W" code (3 amber + 5 white lights).
>>>>
>>>> Removing the trigger makes resume reliable: unbinding the two NHI PCI
>>>> functions, or unloading the thunderbolt module, before suspend both
>>>> avoid the hang completely. The difference in those cases is the PCI
>>>> state the core restores for the driver-bound NHI on resume.
>>>>
>>>> EC team findings (from the platform EC log):
>>>>
>>>> The EC/PD/dock side is healthy across the failing cycle, which points
>>>> the finger at the host resume path rather than the dock:
>>>>
>>>> - Modern Standby entry and resume are seen on the EC side; the dock
>>>> plug interrupt during MS is handled and the full power sequence
>>>> recovers (SLP_S3# okay, PLTRST# received, U8-U20 sequence
>>>> completed).
>>>>
>>>> - The EC-to-dock DDM command exchange fully succeeds: all CMsd/CMgd
>>>> transactions return success (device type, TBT cable type, dock
>>>> module config for USB/TBT/Audio/LAN).
>>>>
>>>> - PD/Type-C renegotiation is normal (power contracts up to 95W/100W);
>>>> no persistent protocol error appears in the log.
>>>>
>>>> - The only suspicious symptom is host-side: the EC repeatedly logs
>>>> PmSt_Timeout_Count while waiting for the BIOS/host to consume the
>>>> wake (PWRB pressed) event. That indicates the host resume path is
>>>> late or stuck, not an EC-to-dock transport failure. The Dell "3A5W"
>>>> diagnostic LED code (3 amber + 5 white) maps in the EC code to an
>>>> SLP_S3#/PLTRST#/RUNPWROK failure indication.
>>>>
>>>> Root cause:
>>>>
>>>> With the driver bound, the PCI core restores the saved NHI config space
>>>> during the noirq resume phase, including PCI_COMMAND with memory space
>>>> and bus mastering enabled. This is the same phase in which the core
>>>> restores the config space of the tunneled PCI bridges and whatever sits
>>>> behind them (the dock). If the AMD host router is made active (memory +
>>>> bus mastering) while the downstream USB4 PCIe tunnel to the dock is still
>>>> being restored and is not yet ready, the host interface starts bus
>>>> activity toward a not-yet-ready endpoint and the PCIe hierarchy wedges.
>>>>
>>>> This matches the workarounds: unbinding the NHI or unloading the module
>>>> means the core does not restore an active NHI over the tunnel during
>>>> noirq, and the hang disappears. Several Thunderbolt-side attempts did not
>>>> help (returning early from nhi_resume_noirq(), disabling host-router wake
>>>> flags, adding an unconditional delay before tunnel activation), which is
>>>> why the actionable boundary is the PCI PM state of the driver-bound AMD
>>>> NHI rather than a later Thunderbolt protocol step. We do not have
>>>> visibility into what the host router does internally in that window; that
>>>> uncertainty is the main reason for sending this as an RFC (see open
>>>> questions below).
>>>>
>>>> What this patch does:
>>>>
>>>> Add a QUIRK_QUIESCE_ON_SUSPEND quirk, currently set for all AMD USB4 host
>>>> routers (matched by vendor AMD + USB4 PCI class), and:
>>>>
>>>> - clear PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY and PCI_COMMAND_MASTER before the PCI core
>>>> saves the NHI config space in runtime and system suspend, so the NHI
>>>> is restored inactive on resume;
>>>>
>>>> - keep the NHI quiescent across nhi_resume_noirq() (return early
>>>> without
>>>> touching the controller), so it stays inactive while the core
>>>> restores the tunneled bridges and the dock;
>>>>
>>>> - once the whole system has resumed, re-enable memory space and bus
>>>> mastering and bring the domain back up from the PM complete callback
>>>> via tb_domain_resume_noirq(), and from nhi_runtime_resume() for the
>>>> runtime PM path.
>>>>
>>>> The result is that Thunderbolt/USB4 stays functional after resume instead
>>>> of the machine hanging or the tunnels staying down until the module is
>>>> reloaded.
>>>>
>>>> Test results:
>>>>
>>>> Tested on the Dell Pro 14 Plus (PB14255, AMD Phoenix, two USB4 host
>>>> routers) with the Dell SD25TB4 dock. Without the patch, the sequence
>>>> above hard-hangs during resume. With the patch, repeated suspend/resume
>>>> cycles with the dock connected complete cleanly with no hang. After
>>>> resume the NHI PCI_COMMAND reads back with MEMORY|MASTER set again, and
>>>> the dock's downstream USB devices re-enumerate, confirming the USB tunnel
>>>> is restored and the domain is functional.
>>>>
>>>> Caveats observed while the NHI is quiescent across noirq: config space
>>>> reads to the host router time out and TMU configuration restore fails
>>>> during that window; the controller and domain are fully brought back in
>>>> nhi_complete(). The DP tunnel restore path was not exercised in this
>>>> test, as no external display was driven through the dock during the
>>>> tested cycle.
>>>>
>>>> Open questions for RFC discussion:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Root cause: what does the AMD host router actually do when it is
>>>> restored with memory + bus mastering enabled during noirq while the
>>>> downstream tunnel is not ready? Is this an expected ordering
>>>> constraint, a firmware behavior, or a hardware erratum?
>>>>
>>>> 2. Scope: the quirk currently matches all AMD USB4 host routers by
>>>> class. Which parts are actually affected? Should this be narrowed
>>>> (e.g. by DMI or specific device IDs) instead of applied to all AMD
>>>> USB4?
>>>>
>>>> 3. Mechanism: is clearing both PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY and
>>>> PCI_COMMAND_MASTER
>>>> the right lever, or would clearing bus mastering alone suffice
>>>> and be
>>>> less invasive? Is poking PCI_COMMAND directly acceptable in the NHI
>>>> driver, or should this move into a PCI backend op / PCI quirk?
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
>>>
>>> I have no idea why I didn't receive this patch in my mailbox - I'm
>>> obviously CC'ed. But I checked my spam and it's not there either.
>>>
>>> But anyway, I am wondering if the real issue here is that we're
>>> accessing the hardware before it's ready. If you can readily reproduce
>>> the issue, can you try this series to see if it helps?
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20260708152650.536604-1-
>>> mario.limonciello@amd.com/
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.h | 5 ++-
>>>> drivers/thunderbolt/pci.c | 8 ++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
>>>> index 698fb124d529..787185c745ae 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>> #include <linux/iommu.h>
>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> #include <linux/property.h>
>>>> #include <linux/string_choices.h>
>>>> @@ -40,6 +41,31 @@ static bool host_reset = true;
>>>> module_param(host_reset, bool, 0444);
>>>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(host_reset, "reset USB4 host router (default: true)");
>>>> +static bool nhi_quirk_quiesce_on_suspend(const struct tb_nhi *nhi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return nhi->quirks & QUIRK_QUIESCE_ON_SUSPEND;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void nhi_disable_pci_mem_master(struct tb_nhi *nhi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(nhi->dev);
>>>> + u16 cmd;
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
>>>> + cmd &= ~(PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);
>>>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void nhi_enable_pci_mem_master(struct tb_nhi *nhi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(nhi->dev);
>>>> + u16 cmd;
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
>>>> + cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER;
>>>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>
>> Is this basically an open coded version of pci_set_master() and
>> pci_clear_master()?
> Yes
>
>>
>> Or is the PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY actually important for this issue?
> Did another try without PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY and it also works. So, this
> flag is not needed.
>
>>
>>>> static int ring_interrupt_index(const struct tb_ring *ring)
>>>> {
>>>> int bit = ring->hop;
>>>> @@ -988,6 +1014,9 @@ static int __nhi_suspend_noirq(struct device
>>>> *dev, bool wakeup)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> + if (nhi_quirk_quiesce_on_suspend(nhi))
>>>> + nhi_disable_pci_mem_master(nhi);
>>>> +
>>
>> Isn't this going to break wakeup interrupts?
> No, plugging in a dock and the system wakes up automatically.
>
Oh; Dell has a special way to handle this from EC communication with
Dell docks that is separate from USB4 wake on connect settings. So even
without a driver loaded the Dell dock should be able to wake the Dell
system.
But I expect it would break non-Dell systems USB4 wake on connect settings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 2:34 [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: Quiesce AMD NHI during suspend Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2026-07-08 15:34 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-08 18:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-15 5:19 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2026-07-15 22:28 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-07-15 1:01 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2026-07-15 1:05 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-15 5:42 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2026-07-15 13:37 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=780d621d-248c-4a6e-9f00-37bf60bd916c@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=Leo.Lin@amd.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=basavaraj.natikar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanath.s@amd.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox