From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBA34A2C; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724588532; cv=none; b=MtzeFiG7A9CHBwmafgI1GwYFIRSi2OGj57UsrAY0UeBW9Y0YMH1H5HNxmRGtWsMCKEpBGDSIrlZGxW8xxil1Wwj9W517RW/7L3bdCGqXBtcoUtWx82KLFzr1ncfQAjZgx5OVMnAMbVwJkbbCGuOr/nFy7rCo1fLrPTxRluTTMdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724588532; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PaZ3gkK7BW4zjJh2O4S3YcY9cxxZbVbiqcRgQ/9z0oI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h8OnvGBHUgsK9hXDKrbc2Yq4pEaFDGBEXDIEQI5fFLptzGcty2NIwnerVa0mJroFFfSA18FVjlsBjIBJo6C95GuNAFOR5TbKtWm9ZYVYhto0KvDIpqdM9stnKuTVXAlDiT7Kd/WyX6mazx3Umu8/BzE/3rkXzSRM12XQTlx996s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=wekktgtE; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=nqm73YxG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="wekktgtE"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="nqm73YxG" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1724588529; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4TvDebQL130PXgRqRzd/ZewCYQHAzeccg/U2iwVkVr0=; b=wekktgtE/ba7qg2rtEKFNctCrisDl184b4ixuH3+slztEb+EnIdAzBRq4FVDblbw0foAyI q2QSVM07rxIWpnJ9bI9kvDWOYIBq5gxVk8REYNn+9Yu5VF9wpnQM3/N+ZSuWQjEugWUZ7H WZSh3BxPQ4jrgK1gegJw5c08A3utl9qzTYBz8id5CMvS+VrHRyzTKJUMTkwCozNYV+WYg1 LrspcPdTT182e/p+zbdcowdLojOCoQ+FYQ9FhjNtZcDh9IPOJnvRjKp/N9GO05ctWgRjxC 07r9mCHVdU3Kcx2zQ34JxOHOuveZPnU8GRI/pVIJIdEOe555p8jxSl3UA7oBNw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1724588529; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4TvDebQL130PXgRqRzd/ZewCYQHAzeccg/U2iwVkVr0=; b=nqm73YxG2F0LLA2+N30jhceXOlcYJqz+4Ohc7yNOIxqNbobplQYDZ+mF72uyp4D3JGpRQh cT30jBKaamF37bCw== To: Mario Limonciello , Bjorn Helgaas , Mathias Nyman , Mika Westerberg Cc: "open list : PCI SUBSYSTEM" , open list , "open list : USB XHCI DRIVER" , Daniel Drake , Gary Li , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ilpo =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Mario Limonciello Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use rdtsc_ordered() when RDTSCP or LFENCE_RDTSC are supported In-Reply-To: <20240823042508.1057791-3-superm1@kernel.org> References: <20240823042508.1057791-1-superm1@kernel.org> <20240823042508.1057791-3-superm1@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 14:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <8734msg5ce.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Aug 22 2024 at 23:25, Mario Limonciello wrote: Why is this hidden in a reply to the middle of a PCI patch series? Sigh. > From: Mario Limonciello > > On AMD processors the TSC has been reported drifting on and off for > various platforms. This has been root caused to becaused by out of order > TSC and HPET counter values. When the SoC supports RDTSCP or LFENCE_RDTSC > use ordered tsc reads instead. This really wants a fixes tag.