Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Aleksander Morgado <aleksandermj@chromium.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux@roeck-us.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ejcaruso@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: cdc-wdm: close race between read and workqueue
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:53:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734rmj3ro.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c35f98be-23a3-41c3-bee5-f394ce504545@suse.com> (Oliver Neukum's message of "Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:14:48 +0200")

Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> writes:
> On 15.04.24 11:26, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> writes:
>>> On 15.04.24 08:47, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>>
>>>> urb from service_outstanding_interrupt(). That's why it was added. See
>>>> the explanation Robert wrote when introducing it:
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c?id=c1da59dad0ebd3f9bd238f3fff82b1f7ffda7829
>>>
>>> Well, the explanation is correct in that we must read
>>> data available. However, if the RESPONDING flag is set
>>> and the URB submitted, we are already doing so.
>> Sounds reasonable.  Except that the bug proves we didn't.
>
> Why? I am afraid I do not get that part.

I don't get how it happens either.  But that's the only thing changed by
the patch.

>  > If you are right that service_outstanding_interrupt can race
>   againts
>> itself (and I don't doubt that), then I guess this could also happen
>> between failure to submit the URB and clearing the flag?
>
> Yes, it can. In fact in this case the behavior should not change.
> I am afraid we have a misunderstanding. It seems to me that in the
> unchanged driver the result of service_outstanding_interrupt()
> is undefined.
> Please explain.

Sorry, I am so lost here that I am probably only confusing things.  I do
not understand why we unlock &desc->iuspin around the usb_submit_urb
call.  And git tells me I wrote that.


Bjørn

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240314115132.3907-1-oneukum () suse ! com>
2024-04-15  5:42 ` [PATCH] usb: cdc-wdm: close race between read and workqueue Aleksander Morgado
2024-04-15  6:47   ` Bjørn Mork
2024-04-15  9:06     ` Oliver Neukum
2024-04-15  9:26       ` Bjørn Mork
2024-04-15  9:52         ` Greg KH
2024-04-15 10:07           ` Oliver Neukum
2024-04-15 10:14         ` Oliver Neukum
2024-04-15 10:53           ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2024-04-15 11:08             ` Oliver Neukum
2024-04-15  8:42   ` Oliver Neukum
2024-04-15 12:08     ` Aleksander Morgado
2024-03-14 11:50 Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8734rmj3ro.fsf@miraculix.mork.no \
    --to=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=aleksandermj@chromium.org \
    --cc=ejcaruso@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox